Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts

Monday, 19 May 2025

Pakistan: Encouraging IMF Staff Level Report

The recently released IMF staff level report praises Pakistan’s strong program implementation and stresses the need to prioritize reforms going forward.

These include reforms to strengthen competition and productivity, improve SOEs and public services, increase energy sector viability, broaden the tax base, and build climate resilience.

Several new structural benchmarks have been introduced, which will impact multiple sectors such as Energy and Autos, and these may be part of the upcoming FY26 Budget.

Pakistan’s macroeconomic recovery has been cemented by growing foreign exchange reserves and sharply lower inflation, enabling the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to halve the policy rate to 11.0%.

GDP growth in FY26 is expected to reach the long-term average, and modestly accelerate thereafter. The current account is expected to remain in control, aided by lower oil prices and strong remittances.

This may limit pressure on the PKR, even as the IMF has encouraged a more flexible exchange rate.

Containing the fiscal deficit, as ever, will likely prove to be the most challenging. The projected improvement on the fiscal deficit is contingent on tax collection, including the effective implementation of the newly introduced Agriculture Income Tax laws.

That said, climate-related funding by the IMF (US$1.4 billion over the course of the program) can be used for budgetary support, which is a positive. 

As of December 2024, Pakistan had met all seven quantitative performance criteria and five of eight indicative targets. Compliance with structural benchmarks was also generally strong.

Important structural benchmarks that have already been met include approval of the National Fiscal Pact, and introduction of Agriculture Income Tax laws at the provincial level. However, others are still pending including eliminating captive power use in the gas sector. The IMF has now introduced additional structural benchmarks.


Friday, 16 May 2025

PSX benchmark index up 11.64%WoW

Pakistan Stock Exchange (PS) regained momentum after a ceasefire agreement between Pakistan and India on May 10, 2025, brokered through US mediation. This eased geopolitical tensions and helped stabilize investor sentiment following a week of heightened volatility. The benchmark index closed the week on May 16, 2025 at 119,649 points, recording a gain of 12,474 points, up 11.64%WoW.

On the first trading day of the week, the benchmark KSE-100 index surged by 10,123 points— the highest single-day gain in point terms. Investor confidence was further reinforced by the International Monetary Fund’s approval and disbursement of US$1 billion tranche under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and approval of an additional arrangement for the US$1.4 billion under the Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF).

On the macroeconomic front, workers’ remittances were reported at US$3.2 billion, resulting in a current account surplus of US$12 million during April 2025. Alongside, Net FDI for the month was reported at US$141 million. Foreign exchange reserves held by State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) increased by US$71 million to US$10.4 billion.

Average daily trading volume was up by 34.8%WoW to 685 million shares as compared to 508 million shares traded in the earlier week.

Other major news flow during the week included: 1) GoP proposed to 10% tax cut for salaried class, 2) Pakistan and Russia consented to set up a steel mill, 3) IFEM on petrol and diesel increased, 4) Prime Minister set up panel for petroleum sector reforms, and 5) Pakistan and India talks in Saudi Arabia to be scheduled shortly.

Vanaspati & Allied Industries, Transport, Refinery, Woollen and Inv.Banks/ Inv.cos/ Securities.cos were amongst the top performers, while Textile Spinning and Jute were amongst the worst performers.

Major selling was recorded by Banks/ DFIs with a net sell of US$20.6 million. Mutual Funds absorbed most of the selling with a net buy of US$39.2 million.

Top performing scrips of the week were: AGL, FCEP, PTC, ATRL and SEARL, while laggards included: PKGP, IBFL, NESTLE, and PGLC.

According to AKD Securities, PSX is expected to remain positive in the coming weeks, with the recent announcement of a ceasefire and release of tranche by IMF likely to be key triggers. The KSE100 is anticipated to sustain its upward trajectory, driven by strong earnings in Fertilizers, sustained ROEs in Banks, and improving cash flows of E&Ps and OMCs, benefiting from falling interest rates and economic stability.

Top pick of the brokerage house include: OGDC, PPL, PSO, FFC, ENGROH, MEBL, MCB, HBL, LUCK, FCCL, INDU and SYS.

Monday, 12 May 2025

Saudi Arabia welcomes Trump's visit

The Council of Ministers welcomed on Monday the official visit of US President Donald Trump to Saudi Arabia, expressing optimism that the visit would strengthen and expand cooperation and the strategic partnership between the two friendly countries across various sectors, in a way serving their mutual interests and visions. Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman chaired the Cabinet session in Riyadh.

At the outset of the session, the Crown Prince briefed the Cabinet on the outcomes of recent talks with leaders of several friendly nations, focusing on bilateral relations and issues of mutual interest.

In a statement to the Saudi Press Agency following the session, Minister of State, Cabinet Member for Shoura Council’s Affairs and Acting Minister of Media Dr. Essam bin Saad bin Saeed said that the Cabinet reviewed regional and international developments and reiterated its firm condemnation of the Israeli occupation authorities' announcement regarding their incursion into and control of the Gaza Strip and Palestinian territories, as well as their ongoing violations of international humanitarian law. The Cabinet reaffirmed the Kingdom's unwavering support for the Palestinian cause and the rights of the Palestinian people.

The Cabinet welcomed the ceasefire agreement between Pakistan and India, and affirmed the Kingdom’s continued commitment to working with international partners to achieve lasting peace between the two nations.

The Cabinet discussed progress in cooperation with international organizations and forums, emphasizing that the Kingdom's hosting of the Munich Security Conference Leaders' Meeting in the last quarter of 2025 reflects its commitment to supporting multilateral approaches that promote international peace and security and address global challenges.

The Cabinet regarded the Kingdom’s election as the Arab Group’s representative to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Council as a testament to its leading role and ongoing efforts in advancing the aviation sector at the local, regional, and international levels, in accordance with the highest standards of safety and efficiency.

The Cabinet approved the guidelines for green investments. It approved the regulations to organize the General Authority of Civil Aviation. The Cabinet endorsed formation of a working group, headed by the General Directorate of Civil Defense and including members from several entities, to implement a program to raise awareness of meteorological phenomena, the mechanism for avoiding their risks, and the implications of alerts and warnings.

The Cabinet decided that the state would bear the taxes and customs duties on live livestock shipments from Dhul Qada 11, corresponding to May 9, until the end of this year's Hajj season.

The Cabinet approved a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the Saudi Ministry of Energy and the Italian Ministry of Environment and Energy Security for cooperation in the field of energy, and a general cooperation agreement between the governments of Saudi Arabia and Eswatini.

The Council authorized the minister of foreign affairs or his deputy to discuss and sign with the Vanuatuan side a draft general cooperation agreement between the two governments, in addition to authorizing the minister of education or his deputy to discuss and sign with the US side a draft MoU for cooperation in the field of education and training.

The Cabinet approved a MoU between the Saudi Food and Drug Authority and the Chinese National Medical Products Administration for cooperation in the field of regulating drugs, medical devices, and cosmetics, and another MoU between the Saudi Human Rights Commission and Tajikistan's Commissioner for Human Rights.

The Council approved a MoU between the Saudi Presidency of State Security and the Omani General Secretariat for Communications and Coordination in the field of combating terrorism crimes and their financing, and another MoU for cooperation and news exchange between the Saudi Press Agency and the Senegalese Press Agency.

 

Saturday, 10 May 2025

India and Pakistan accuse each other of ceasefire violations

India and Pakistan accused each other of violating an agreed ceasefire on Saturday, just hours after reaching the US-brokered deal aimed at ending one of the most dangerous escalations between the nuclear-armed rivals in decades, reports Reuters.

The ceasefire, which came after weeks of cross-border missile and drone strikes, was announced earlier in the day following negotiations involving top US and regional officials.

India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said the ceasefire agreement had been breached “repeatedly” and blamed Pakistan for initiating the violations.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry rejected the accusation and blamed Indian forces for violating the ceasefire. In a statement, the ministry said Pakistan remained committed to the truce and was “handling the situation with responsibility and restraint.”

The agreement had been announced earlier in the day by US President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. “Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence,” he wrote, hailing the full and immediate ceasefire deal.

Under the terms of the agreement, both sides pledged to halt all military action by land, air, and sea. Military officials from both countries spoke Saturday afternoon to finalize the terms.

Despite the mutual accusations, both governments have expressed interest in pursuing further talks. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said discussions would soon begin on a broader agreement at a neutral site.

India and Pakistan agree to ceasefire

US President Donald Trump said on Saturday that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate ceasefire" after a fourth day of strikes and counter-strikes against each other's military installations, reports Reuters.

Pakistan's foreign minister also said both countries had agreed to a ceasefire "with immediate effect" and India's foreign ministry said it would start at 5.00pm Indian time, 1130 GMT.

"After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

The sudden announcement came on a day when fears spiked that the countries' nuclear arsenals might come into play as Pakistan's military said a top military and civilian body overseeing its nuclear weapons would meet. The officials from both sides showed a willingness to take a step back following the day's exchanges, as the combined civilian death toll on the two sides rose to 66.

"Pakistan and India have agreed to a ceasefire with immediate effect," Pakistani Foreign minister Ishaq Dar posted on X.

"Pakistan has always strived for peace and security in the region, without compromising on its sovereignty and territorial integrity."

India's foreign ministry said that the head of Pakistan's military operations called his Indian counterpart on Saturday afternoon and it was agreed that both sides would stop all firing.

The two heads will speak to each other again on May 12, the ministry added.

The fighting began on Wednesday when India carried out strikes on what it said was "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistani Kashmir and Pakistan, two weeks after 26 people were killed in an attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir.

Pakistan denied India's accusations that it was involved in the tourist attack. Since Wednesday, the two countries have exchanged cross-border fire and shelling, and sent drones and missiles into each other's airspace.

The countries have been locked in a dispute over Kashmir since they were born after the end of British colonial rule in 1947. Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan both claim Kashmir in full but rule it in part.

They have gone to war three times since, including twice over Kashmir, and clashed several times.

India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. It also blames Pakistani Islamist militant groups for attacks elsewhere in India.

Pakistan rejects both charges. It says it only provides moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiri separatists.

 

 

India and Pakistan step up military strikes

Pakistan and India launched strikes and counter-strikes against each other's military installations on Saturday, prompting US calls for the nuclear-armed neighbours to begin talks and defuse their escalating conflict, the most intense since 1999.

Fears that the countries' nuclear arsenals might come into play spiked when the Pakistan military said a top military and civil body overseeing its nuclear weapons would meet, but the defence minister later said no such meeting was scheduled.

As tensions remain high, residents across Pakistan and India have rushed to stockpile food and other essential supplies, while families living near the border fled to safer areas. Indian authorities have installed sirens in high-rise buildings in New Delhi, some 650 kilometres (400 miles) from the border.

Pakistan early on Saturday said it had targeted multiple bases in India, including a missile storage site in India's north, in response to prior attacks by the Indian military.

India said there was limited damage to equipment and personnel at four air force stations. The military said there were several high-speed missile attacks on air bases in Punjab state and that India had responded to the attacks.

Five civilians were killed in the attacks in the Jammu region of Indian Kashmir, regional police said. Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan both claim Kashmir in full but rule it in part.

Blasts rang out across Indian Kashmir and the Sikh holy city of Amritsar in neighbouring Punjab until early morning on Saturday. Jammu streets were empty hours after loud blasts were heard and projectiles were seen flying across the city sky.

"Jammu city has never been hit before. Never thought we will be hit like this," said 60-year-old Rajeev Gupta, whose brother was wounded by a shell.

Pakistan said that, before its offensive, India had fired missiles at three air bases, including one close to the capital, Islamabad, but Pakistani air defences intercepted most of them.

Locked in a longstanding dispute over Kashmir, the two countries have engaged in daily clashes since Wednesday when India launched strikes inside Pakistan on what it called "terrorist infrastructure". Pakistan vowed to retaliate.

Pakistan's information minister said in a post on X that Saturday's military operation was named "Operation Bunyanun Marsoos". The term is taken from the Koran and means a firm, united structure.

India has said its strikes on Wednesday, which started the latest round of clashes that have left more than 50 people dead in both countries, were in retaliation for a deadly attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir last month.

Pakistan denied India's accusations that it was involved in the tourist attack. Since Wednesday, the two countries have exchanged cross-border fire and shelling, and sent drones and missiles into each other's airspace.

Despite growing Western calls for peace, defence experts said the opposite seemed to be happening.

"Operations moving to next level - free use of missiles and drones by both sides," said Pravin Sawhney, a defence author and former Indian Army officer. "And reports that Pakistan Army is moving troops forward. Not good indications of what lies ahead!"

Tuesday, 6 May 2025

India strikes Pakistan

According to Reuters, India attacked Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir on Wednesday. Pakistan said it had shot down five Indian fighter jets in the worst fighting in more than two decades between the nuclear-armed enemies.

India said it struck nine Pakistani "terrorist infrastructure" sites, some of them linked to an attack by Islamist militants on Hindu tourists that killed 26 people in Indian Kashmir last month. Islamabad said six Pakistani locations were targeted, killing eight people.

Indian forces attacked the headquarters of Islamist militant groups Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba, an Indian defence source told Reuters.

"India has demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution," the Indian defence ministry said in a statement.

Pakistan said Indian missiles hit three sites and a military spokesperson told Reuters five Indian aircraft had been shot down, a claim not confirmed by India.

"All of these engagements have been done as a defensive measure," military spokesperson Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said. "Pakistan remains a very responsible state. However, we will take all the steps necessary for defending the honour, integrity and sovereignty of Pakistan, at all cost."

 

Monday, 5 May 2025

Pakistan: SBP lowers interest rate by 100bps

After keeping the rates unchanged in March’s monetary policy, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has cut the policy rate by 100bps to 11.0%. The policy rate has halved in less than a year, down from 22.0% in June 2024. Intermarket Securities believes the key reasons behind the rate cut are:

Headline CPI coming off to multi-decade low in April, with core inflation dipping to 8.0%YoY, resulting in an improved inflation outlook. 

Weak LSM readings feeding into anemic GDP growth of just 1.5%YoY in 1HFY25 (FY25 GDP growth is projected to be sluggish between 2.5% to 3.5%. The shortfall in tax collection has also widened.

Much talked about buildup in foreign exchange reserves to US$14 billion by June 2025, together with expected continued reserves buildup in FY26 even if the current account slips back into a modest deficit. 

Outlook for softer global growth, backed by recent IMF estimate downgrades and sharply lower oil prices.  

The brokerage house believes equities should find something to cheer after the rate cut, having suffered a difficult April, KSE-100 index shed 5.5% on Pakistan-India tensions. That said, given the pace of monetary easing in the previous twelve months, the brokerage house believes the SBP is likely to take a more cautious approach going forward.

With macroeconomic stabilization having been achieved, fiscal reforms remain important for lengthening the economic cycle. The coming Budget, expected in early June, will be a key checkpoint in this respect.

The brokerage house continues to remain positive on Pakistan equities. Its base-case KSE-100 Index target for end December 2025 is 130,000 points.

 

 

Sunday, 27 April 2025

Kashmir conflict after Pahalgam attack

The most recent conflict between India and Pakistan in the Kashmir region has once again brought the area to the brink of a deep crisis, especially since both nations are armed with nuclear weapons.

India has upped the ante by blaming Pakistan for the tragedy, without providing credible evidence of this country’s alleged involvement in the brutal slaying of tourists.

The recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam in the Indian-administered Kashmir, which resulted in the tragic demise of numerous tourists, has not only intensified India's animosity towards Pakistan but has also garnered global scrutiny regarding the prospects of an extensive military conflict.

Since gaining independence in 1947, Kashmir has been split between India and Pakistan, with each country asserting ownership over the entire region while controlling distinct areas. This division has resulted in ongoing tensions that have escalated into conflict over time.

On Tuesday, at least 26 people were killed by suspected rebels at a resort in Pahalgam, making this the deadliest such attack in a quarter-century in Kashmir. A statement issued in the name of The Resistance Front (TRF), which is said to be part of the Lashkar-e-Taiba armed group, based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility.

The aftermath has prompted notable diplomatic pushback. India has declared its exit from the Indus Waters Treaty, an important water-sharing pact established by the World Bank in 1960, while Pakistan countered by suspending a significant canal irrigation initiative and prohibiting Indian flights from its airspace. 

Pakistani officials have dismissed India's allegations, with Defense Minister Khawaja Asif asserting that "blaming Pakistan won’t address" the issue of Kashmir’s disputed status. 

The Indian government has admitted failing to protect tourists at Pahalgam, Mallikarjum Kharge, president of the All India Congress Committee, said during a speech.

He added that the government confirmed during an all-party meeting on Thursday that a security lapse allowed the attack to happen.

Kharge, who heads the opposition in the upper house of India’s parliament, said a three-phase security plan was in place but ultimately failed.

Amid this volatile situation, Iran has taken on the role of a mediator, understanding the complex geopolitics of the subcontinent and choosing not to take sides.

Iran’s diplomatic initiative is underscored by its historical balancing act between India and Pakistan, maintaining strong ties with both while advocating for regional stability. 

On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on his X social account, “India and Pakistan are brotherly neighbors of Iran, enjoying relations rooted in centuries-old cultural and civilizational ties,” adding that “Tehran stands ready to use its good offices in Islamabad and New Delhi to forge greater understanding at this difficult time”.

Given the nuclear-armed status of both India and Pakistan, Iran’s mediation effort represents a crucial attempt to de-escalate tensions and prevent further destabilization in South Asia.

Tehran’s stance reflects its broader regional strategy to promote peace through dialogue and resist external powers’ divisive influences in the Kashmir dispute.

Pakistan said on Saturday it is “fully prepared to cooperate with any neutral investigators” following the Pahalgam attack.

In an editorial published on Saturday, Pakistan’s Dawn news outlet said, “It is time again to give diplomacy a chance as neither Pakistan nor India can afford war.”

The editorial added, “These are dangerous times in the subcontinent, and there is a need for both Pakistan and India to show restraint, and handle the post-Pahalgam developments with sense.

 

Saturday, 26 April 2025

PSX witnesses volatility due to rising tension between India and Pakistan

Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) remained volatile throughout the week ended Friday 25, 2025, as escalating geopolitical tensions post the Pahalgam attack in Indian Occupied Kashmir and India’s subsequent threats to revoke the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan further undermined investor sentiment. The KSE-100 index closed the week at 115,469 points, losing 1,846 points, down 1.57%WoW.

Positive news stemmed from the IMF's World Economic Outlook for April 2025, lowering Pakistan's inflation forecast for FY25 to 5.1%YoY and 7.7%YoY for FY26. On the flip side, growth projection for FY25 was revised slightly downward to 2.7%, from 2.8% previously.

The news reports indicate that authorities have reached a preliminary agreement with two foreign commercial banks for a US$1 billion loan facility, at interest rate of 7.6%.

Finance Minister met with representatives from credit rating agency Moody's in an effort to improve Pakistan's credit rating, following a recent upgrade by Fitch.

PKR depreciated 0.09%WoW against the greenback.

Foreign exchange reserves held by State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) decreased by US$367 million to US$10.2 billion as of April 18, 2025.

Other major news flow during the week included: 1) Finance Minister met with IMF chief, 2) Government urged to fully deregulate wheat supply chain, 3) Cabinet recommended to abolish FED on property transfer, 4) Kuwait announced to join Pakistan offshore bids and 5) Pakistan missed wheat production target.

Vanaspati & Allied Industries, Synthetic & Rayon, and Textile Spinning were amongst the top performers, while Refinery, Jute, and Transport were amongst the laggards.

Major selling was recorded by Banks/ DFI with a net sell of US$4.0 million. Organizations and Foreigners absorbed most of the selling with a net buy of US$6.9.

Top performing scrips of the week were: NATF, FCEPL, MUREB, ATLH, and SNGP, while laggards included: BOP, PIBTL, EPCL, AGL, and HUMNL.

According to Pakistan’s leading brokerage house, AKD Securities lower oil prices and favorable standing among exporting peers amid reciprocal tariffs will support Pakistan’s economy and strengthen the outlook for a return to single-digit interest rates in CY25.

The benchmark index is anticipated to sustain its upward trajectory, primarily driven by strong earnings in Fertilizers, sustained ROEs in Banks, and improving cash flows of E&Ps and OMCs, benefiting from falling interest rates and economic stability. Top pick of the brokerage house includes, OGDC, PPL, PSO, FFC, ENGROH, MEBL, MCB, HBL, FCCL, INDU, ILP and SYS.

Friday, 25 April 2025

Prince Faisal talks to Indian and Pakistani counterparts

Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan held separate phone calls with his counterparts in Pakistan and India on Friday. He discussed bilateral relations and the evolving regional situation amid rising tensions between the two South Asian nations, reports Saudi Gazette.

The diplomatic outreach followed a deadly militant attack on Tuesday near Pahalgam in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir’s scenic Pesarang Valley.

The assault claimed the lives of at least 26 people and triggered a wave of accusations and retaliatory measures from both sides.

Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said in a post on social media that he discussed the Pahalgam attack and its cross-border connections with Prince Faisal.

Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar also posted on X, stating that the two ministers agreed to maintain consultations and coordination on the unfolding regional developments.

The Kashmir attack, which India has blamed on Pakistan-based militants, has sharply escalated tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. In response, India suspended a key water-sharing treaty, closed a major land border crossing, and halted airspace and trade agreements with Pakistan.

Islamabad, in turn, warned of potential military action, further raising fears of a broader conflict.

Thursday, 24 April 2025

India threatens to terminate Indus Water Treaty

India has announced to take a series of retaliatory measures, including its intent to terminate the Indus Waters Treaty. This significant development is likely to heighten geopolitical risks in the region.

The Treaty signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan under the mediation of the World Bank, governs the sharing of the waters of the Indus River and its tributaries. The treaty allocates the three eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej) to India, and the three western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab) to Pakistan, with limited rights for India to use the western rivers for non-consumptive purposes such as hydroelectric power generation.

The treaty has survived multiple conflicts and is considered one of the most successful examples of water-sharing agreements in the world.

If India were to unilaterally withdraw from the treaty, it would likely violate international law, as such agreements are generally considered binding and cannot be terminated unilaterally without consequences.

For Pakistan, any disruption to the flow of the western rivers could have severe implications for agriculture, which is the backbone of its economy, as well as for water availability in key regions. 

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2025

India downgrades ties with Pakistan

According to Reuters, India has announced a raft of measures to downgrade its ties with Pakistan on Wednesday, a day after suspected militants killed 26 men at a tourist destination in Kashmir in the worst attack on civilians in the country in nearly two decades.

Diplomatic ties between the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours were weak even before the latest measures were announced as Pakistan had expelled India's envoy and not posted its own ambassador in New Delhi after India revoked the special status of Kashmir in 2019.

Pakistan had also halted its main train service to India and banned Indian films, seeking to exert diplomatic pressure.

Tuesday's attack is seen as a setback to what Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party have projected as a major achievement in revoking the semi-autonomous status Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed and bringing peace and development to the long-troubled Muslim-majority region.

On Wednesday, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri told a media briefing that the cross-border involvement in the Kashmir attack was underscored at a special security cabinet meeting, prompting it to act against Pakistan.

He said New Delhi would immediately suspend the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty "until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism."

The treaty, mediated by the World Bank, split the Indus River and its tributaries between the neighbours and regulated the sharing of water. It had so far withstood even wars between the neighbours.

Pakistan is heavily dependent on water flowing downstream from this river system from Indian Kashmir for its hydropower and irrigation needs. Suspending the treaty would allow India to deny Pakistan its share of the waters.

India also closed the only open land border crossing point between the two countries and said that those who have crossed into India can return through the point before May 01, 2025.

With no direct flights operating between the two countries, the move severs all transport links between them.

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2025

Pros and cons of importing US oil for Pakistan

Pakistan is considering importing crude oil from the United States to offset a trade imbalance that triggered higher US tariffs. However, many analysts question the economic viability of the proposal. Let us explore prose and cons of the proposal.

Pakistan imported 137,000 barrels per day of crude in 2024, mostly light grades from the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates among its top suppliers. Oil imports amounted over US$5 billion in 2024.

In February 2025, Saudi Arabia, through the Saudi Fund for Development (SFD), extended a US$1.2 billion financing facility to Pakistan for the import of oil products for a year. The SFD has provided approximately US$7 billion to Islamabad for oil products since 2019.

While the Government seems adamant at importing crude oil from the United States, experts have to find credible replies in favor of the move.

​Importing crude oil from the US could be a strategically viable option for Pakistan, but it involves several economic, logistical, and technical considerations.​

Potential Benefits

Reducing Trade Imbalance and Tariffs
Pakistan is exploring the import of US crude oil to address a US$3 billion trade surplus with the US, which has led to a 29% tariff on Pakistani exports. By purchasing approximately US$1 billion worth of US crude, Pakistan aims to mitigate these tariffs and improve trade relations.

Diversification of Energy Sources
Currently, Pakistan relies heavily on Middle Eastern countries for its crude oil imports, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE accounting for over 95% of its supply. Introducing US crude into the mix could enhance energy security by diversifying supply sources.

Challenges and Constraints

Refinery Compatibility
Pakistani refineries are primarily configured to process Middle Eastern light crude. While the exact compatibility with US crude grades varies, historical challenges with processing non-Middle Eastern crude, such as Russian oil, suggest potential technical limitations.

Higher Transportation Costs
Transporting crude oil from the United States involves longer distances as compared to Middle Eastern sources, leading to increased shipping costs and logistical complexities.

Dependence on Existing Financial Support
Saudi Arabia provides significant financial assistance to Pakistan for oil imports, shifting a portion of imports to the US might affect these favorable financing arrangements.

 Infrastructure Considerations

Pakistan's current oil import infrastructure includes ports like Karachi and specialized facilities such as Cnergyico's Single Point Mooring (SPM), capable of handling large crude carriers. While these facilities can accommodate increased imports, the overall capacity and efficiency of the supply chain would need assessment to handle US crude effectively.

Importing crude oil from the United States presents an opportunity to Pakistan to diversify its energy sources and address trade imbalances. However, it requires careful consideration of refinery capabilities, transportation logistics, and existing financial dependencies.

 

Saturday, 5 April 2025

Bangladesh and the US tariff storm

US President Donald Trump yesterday stood in the White House Rose Garden, pointing to an oversized placard with details of levies he is set to impose on imports from America’s trading partners. Trump dramatically ratcheted up his trade war. Bangladesh is among those countries whose labor-intensive export industries will receive a heavy blow.

Under Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” policy, Bangladeshi exports to the United States now face a 37% levy — a move that threatens to strain trade with its largest single-country export market.

Trump has targeted nations, accusing them of putting disproportionate barriers to American exports. He imposed 10% universal tariffs on all US trade partners as well as additional, heavier duties on 60 countries he deemed the “worst offenders” of unfair trade practices. The universal tariffs will start on Saturday before the country-specific, higher reciprocal tariff takes effect from April 09. 2025.

The penalties unleashed turbulence across world markets and drew condemnation from many countries facing the end of an era of trade liberalization that has shaped the global order for decades.

While significant for Bangladesh, this move aligns with similarly stringent tariffs across the region, suggesting a broader strategic intent rather than targeting Bangladesh alone.

Notably, Vietnam, a close competitor for Bangladesh in the international garment trade, faces an even higher tariff of 46%, despite the Southeast Asian nation’s proactive attempts to mitigate tariff threats by cutting levies on American goods and pledging to increase imports of significant US products.

However, this offers little comfort to Bangladesh. Its economy, heavily reliant on exports to the United States, particularly garments, now faces headwinds.

“For countries like Bangladesh and other developing countries, this shift poses significant challenges, as they may face tougher economic conditions under such an uncertain regime,” Professor Selim Raihan, executive director of the South Asian Network on Economic Modeling, said.

Industry experts in Dhaka fear the sharp increase in tariffs could erode Bangladesh’s competitive edge, potentially diverting US buyers to other countries. Still, the US will remain Bangladesh’s largest single-country export destination, with apparel constituting about 90% of total exports to American markets.

Bangladesh’s exports to the US rose 1.1%YoY to US$8.4 billion in 2024, driven largely by the country’s dominant garment sector, according to data from the United States Trade Representative.

Bangladesh’s imports from the US totaled US$2.2 billion in 2024, a 1.5% decrease from the previous year. As a result, the US trade deficit with Bangladesh widened to US$6.2 billion — a figure that determined the new tariff rate.

“The immediate priority is damage control, as the reciprocal tariffs are already in effect, with no time allowed for a smooth transition. Even goods currently en route to the US will be subject to the new tariffs, raising the critical question, who will bear the cost?” said Zahid Hussain, a former lead economist of the World Bank’s Dhaka office.

Bangladesh’s strategy should aim to shift the tariff burden onto buyers, according to Hussain. “A key advantage is that buyers have limited alternatives, as many of our competitors face similar or even higher reciprocal tariffs. However, fierce competition among [local] sellers poses a significant challenge, enabling wholesale buyers like Walmart and Target to pass the tariff costs onto us,” he said.

To counter this, it is crucial for sellers to collectively agree not to accept a reduction in prices to offset the tariff. The relevant association must closely monitor renegotiated prices and enforce penalties for non-compliance with this agreed position, Hussain said.

“Additionally, we should explore the possibility of qualifying our exports for duty exemptions by emphasizing their status as low-priced essential products.”

Analysts point out this escalation is part of broader regional trade realignment, as neighboring India and Pakistan also face reciprocal tariffs of 27% and 29%, respectively.

India’s export competitiveness would be less impacted than that of key rivals due to its position in the middle of the tariff rates, said the country’s industry bodies and the Federation of Indian Export Organizations.

The tariffs would remain in effect until Trump determined that the “threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying non-reciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved, or mitigated,” the White House said.

Courtesy: The Bangladesh Chronicle

 

 

Friday, 4 April 2025

Pakistan: Navigating an Uncertain Global Order

The world is undergoing a profound shift toward protectionism and unpredictability. Global institutions are weakening, long-standing norms are eroding, and power dynamics are replacing cooperative frameworks. In this volatile environment, Pakistan must stay alert and prepare for the challenges ahead.

This transformation is already in motion. US President Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs signaled a move away from multilateralism. The shift toward unilateralism and economic nationalism has been ushered in. The rules-based global order, which once promoted free trade and transparency, is on the decline.

For decades, the US championed institutions like the WTO, enabling developing countries, including Pakistan, to engage in global trade under shared rules. Now, the rise of "reciprocal tariffs" and deal-making based on narrow self-interest marks a rejection of that system. In such an environment, even close allies are vulnerable.

This shift is especially alarming for countries like Pakistan. Larger powers may use economic tools or coercion to advance their agendas, sidelining smaller economies. A coordinated international backlash to protectionist policies is likely. While Pakistan may avoid retaliation, others might not, raising the specter of a global trade war.

Trade wars have historically led to severe economic disruptions. Pakistan, with low foreign exchange reserves and heavy reliance on institutions like the IMF, lacks the resilience to absorb such shocks. Unlike wealthier nations, it cannot offer major stimulus measures or safety nets.

Thus, Pakistani policymakers must proactively engage with global powers, diversify trade relationships, and strengthen internal governance. Strategic partnerships with like-minded nations and regional initiatives like CPEC are essential, but overreliance on any one partner is risky. A multi-vector foreign policy is key.

Domestically, political stability and unity are crucial. A fragmented leadership weakens Pakistan’s ability to respond to global shifts. The world order we knew is unlikely to return soon. Only countries that are agile, united, and forward-looking will succeed.

Pakistan must not be passive. With vigilance, decisive leadership, and strategic focus, it can navigate this turbulent global landscape and secure a stable future.

Saturday, 22 March 2025

United States No Exit from Pakistan

"No Exit from Pakistan" by Daniel S. Markey offers an in-depth analysis of the complex and often turbulent relationship between the United States and Pakistan. Markey, drawing on his extensive experience in South Asian affairs, explores the multifaceted nature of Pakistan and the challenges it presents to US foreign policy.​

Complex Pakistani Identity:

Markey portrays Pakistan as a nation with multiple identities: an elite-dominated society, a military-centric state, a breeding ground for terrorism, and a country with a youthful, idealistic population. This diversity complicates both internal governance and external relations.

US-Pakistan Relations:

The book traces the historical oscillations in US-Pakistan relations, highlighting periods of close military cooperation during Pakistan's military regimes and strained ties during its democratic transitions.

Anti-US Sentiment:

Markey delves into the roots of anti-US sentiments in Pakistan, noting that both conservative and liberal factions harbor distrust towards the US, albeit for different reasons. Conservatives view the US as untrustworthy, while liberals criticize US support for military dictatorships over democratic institutions.

The author presents three strategic options for the US:

Defensive Insulation:

Minimizing engagement with Pakistan while protecting US interests through intelligence and military means.

Military-First Cooperation:

Focusing on strengthening ties with Pakistan's military to achieve security objectives.

Comprehensive Cooperation:

Engaging with both civilian and military sectors to promote democratic institutions, economic development, and counter-terrorism efforts.

Markey emphasizes that there is "no exit" from Pakistan for the United States, underscoring the necessity of a nuanced and sustained engagement to navigate this intricate bilateral relationship.

 

Thursday, 13 March 2025

Pakistan: 27 people die in rescue operation

According to CNN, nearly 350 hostages have been rescued at the end of a deadly standoff between Pakistan’s military and armed militants who hijacked a train in the southwestern Pakistani province of Baluchistan. The incident, which began Tuesday left dozens dead.

The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), a militant separatist group active in the restive and mineral-rich Baluchistan province, claimed responsibility for the attack.

A total of 27 hostages were killed by the BLA, the security source said, as well as one soldier. At least 35 militants were killed in the rescue operation, the security source added.

Around 450 passengers were on the Jaffer Express enroute from Baluchistan’s capital Quetta to Peshawar in the north, when militants opened “intense gunfire” as the train traveled through a tunnel early in its journey, according to officials.

Pakistan’s military then launched an operation to confront the attackers who used “women and children as shields,” according to security sources not authorized to speak to CNN.

One rescued woman described scenes of chaos following the attack, likening it to the “Day of Judgement.” She told CNN she fled gunfire and walked for two hours to reach safety.

Passenger Mohammad Ashraf told CNN he saw more than 100 armed individuals on the train and that no harm was inflicted on women and children.

The security sources accused the militants of being in contact with handlers in Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s military and government have long accused Afghanistan of providing sanctuary to militant groups, something its Taliban leaders have denied.

Tuesday’s kidnapping is an audacious moment for a separatist insurgency that seeks greater political autonomy and economic development in the strategically important and mineral-rich mountainous region.

But it also highlights the ever-deteriorating security situation there – one that Pakistan’s government has been grappling with for decades.

Baluchistan’s population – made up mostly of the ethnic Baloch group – is deeply disenfranchised, impoverished, and has been growing increasingly alienated from the federal government by decades of policies widely seen as discriminatory.

An insurgency there has been ongoing for decades but has gained traction in recent years since the province’s deep-water Gwadar port was leased to China, the jewel in the crown of Beijing’s “Belt and Road” infrastructure push in Pakistan.

The port, often touted as “the next Dubai,” has become a security nightmare with persistent bombings of vehicles carrying Chinese workers, resulting in many deaths.

Some analysts said Tuesday’s attack marked an escalation in the sophistication of attacks by the insurgents.

The “larger point that the Pakistani state is not grasping ... is that it’s not business as usual anymore,” said Abdul Basit, a Senior Associate Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore.

“The insurgency has evolved both in its strategy and scale,” he added, saying Pakistan’s approach to tackle the Baloch militants’ “seem to have run its course.”

“Instead of revising its counterproductive policies, it is persisting with them, resulting in recurrent security and intelligence failures,” Basit said.

The BLA has been responsible for the deadliest attacks in Pakistan in the past year.

A suicide bombing by the BLA at a train station in Quetta killed more than two dozen people last November. The previous month, it claimed responsibility for an attack on a convoy of Chinese engineers, resulting in two deaths.

In the wake of Tuesday’s attack, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif vowed to “continue to fight against the monster of terrorism until it is completely eradicated from the country.”

In a statement, he said the “terrorists’ targeting of innocent passengers during the peaceful and blessed month of Ramadan is a clear reflection that these terrorists have no connection with the religion of Islam, Pakistan and Baluchistan.”

Analysts say such attacks need urgent attention from the federal government.

“Tuesday’s attack has gained global attention and it will worry China, which has its investments in the province – more than any other state,” said Basit. “A major reset of existing security paradigm is required in Baluchistan.”

Tuesday, 11 March 2025

Pakistan: Militants hijack train in Baluchistan

According to the Saudi Gazette, a train carrying hundreds of passengers has been attacked and halted by armed militants in Pakistan's Baluchistan region.

The Baluch Liberation Army (BLA) confirmed it had attacked the Jaffar Express Train which was traveling from Quetta to Rawalpindi.

The militant group has also claimed the train is under their control.

Pakistani police told news reporters that they had received information that three people, including the train driver, had been injured in the attack.

Police added that security forces had been sent to the scene of the attack.

In a statement, the BLA, a militant separatist group, claimed responsibility for the attack and said they had taken hostages from the train, including security forces.

Officials from the provincial government or railways did not confirm on hostages being taken.

Security forces had reached the site of the incident, in the Mushqaf area of the Bolan district, a railway official said.

The provincial government has imposed emergency measures and all institutions have been mobilized to deal with the situation, government spokesperson Shahid Rind said.

A decades-long insurgency in Baluchistan by separatist militant groups has led to frequent attacks against the government, army and Chinese interests in the region, pressing demands for a share in mineral-rich resources.

The BLA seeks independence for Baluchistan. It is the biggest of several ethnic insurgent groups that have battled the South Asian nation’s government for decades, saying it unfairly exploits Baluchistan’s rich gas and mineral resources.

Saturday, 1 March 2025

Pakistan: Suicide attack kills top cleric

The bombing of Darul Uloom Haqqania in KP’s Nowshera district on Friday marks a departure from the recent trend of militants targeting mostly security personnel and government officials. A number of victims lost their lives in the tragedy, including Maulana Hamidul Haq Haqqani, head of the institution, who appeared to be the religious heir of his murdered father, Maulana Samiul Haq.

The latter, along with his involvement in Pakistani politics, was known as the ‘Father of the Taliban’; he had earned the moniker because numerous high-ranking Afghan Taliban leaders had attended his madressah. Media reports have quoted police officials as saying that it was a suicide blast, and that Hamid Haqqani was the apparent target.

While no group has claimed responsibility for the terrorist attack, the Afghan Taliban have insinuated that the self-styled Islamic State may be involved. An Afghan interior ministry official, while condemning the attack, pinned the blame on “enemies of religion”, an apparent reference to IS.

Those familiar with the militancy dynamics of the region also concur that there is a strong possibility that this is IS-K’s handiwork, as the latter had been openly critical of the Haqqania seminary.

There is, of course, no love lost between the Afghan Taliban and IS, but from Pakistan’s point of view, if the attack were indeed traced to IS, it would signal a fresh security challenge in KP.

Already the province, as well as parts of Baluchistan, are witnessing frequent terrorist activity believed to be carried out by the banned TTP and affiliated groups. IS is an equally — if not more — ferocious entity, with global pretensions and a mediaeval, sectarian outlook.

What adds further credence to the belief that IS may be involved is that the group, and those adhering to its ideological narrative, view clerics who endorse democracy in any form with disdain. The late Haqqania head, as well as his father, were active in politics, along with their religious activities.

It is also a possibility that the Haqqanis’ strong links with the Afghan Taliban could have made them prime targets for rival militants. Only a thorough probe can establish the facts, while fresh IS activity in the country should be cause for considerable concern.

Nevertheless, the attack also offers an opportunity for Islamabad and Kabul to work together against a common, and highly dangerous foe.

Courtesy: Dawn