PSX index remains under pressure

Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) remained under pressure during the week ended on August 21, 2026. The benchmark Index closed at 177,167. Total Market capitalization also contracted to US$71.6 billion from US$72.5 billion last week.

The average daily trading volume edged up marginally by 0.3%WoW to 1,053.4 million shares, as compared to 1,050.5 million shares in the previous week.

The dominant driver remained the unresolved US-Iran conflict, now approaching six months since first strikes began on February 28.

Brent crude posted its second consecutive weekly gain, up over 6%WoW to US$94.2/ bbl, with neither side making any effort to restart talks after the 60-day ceasefire expired.

The current account deficit narrowed to US$328 million in July 2026, down 38%YoY, aided by rebound in goods exports and strong remittance flows.

State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) raised PKR518 billion through T-Bills, with yields ranging between 11.47%-11.99% across all tenors.

On the sectoral front, Urea offtakes declined 5%YoY and DAP 10%YoY in July 2026, while IT exports recorded 18%YoY increase to US$417 million.

Other major news flow during the week included: 1) Pakistan scrambles to secure Qatar LNG cargo by August, 25 as spot prices surged, 2) LSM index rose 5%YoY in FY26, 3) Pakistan pushes China B2B deals from MoUs to investments & exports, 4) Circular debt jumps by PKR364 billion in FY26, and 5) Pakistan, Norway agree to enhance ties in various sectors.

Top performing sectors were: Refinery, OMC, and E&P, while Banks, Power, and Textile Composite were the laggards.

Major selling was recorded by Banks and Mutual Funds with US$14.5 million and US$10.6 million, respectively. Major buyers were Individuals with US$17.5 million.

Top performing scrips were: PGLC, ATRL, PSO, INIL, and CNERGY, while laggards included THALL, CHCC, TGL, PABC, and PAEL.

AKD Securities expects the market to improve on strengthening economic indicators amid easing geopolitical tensions, along with favorable financial results for June 2026.

Additionally, a potential US-Iran deal could moderate international oil prices towards pre-conflict levels.

Market continues to trade at attractive valuations.

The brokerage house forecasts the Index to reach 263,800 by end December 2026.

Top picks of the brokerage house include: OGDC, PPL, UBL, MEBL, HBL, FFC, ENGROH, PSO, LUCK, FCCL, INDU, ILP and SYS.

How Iran is shaping the new navigational order in the Strait of Hormuz?

In a new monthly series on the Seatrade Maritime News Podcast entitled Maritime Crossroads we will be exploring the critical issues of maritime and energy risks in the Middle East region.

The series features Noam Raydan, a Senior Fellow at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, discussing issues with Marcus Hand, Editor of Seatrade Maritime News.

The first episode explores how Iran is changing the navigational order in one of world’s most key waterways – the Strait of Hormuz.

The internationally recognized routes in the Strait of Hormuz were adopted by International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 1968 but these are no longer being used by commercial shipping.

“Instead, we have a completely new navigational order, and this is what Iran right now wants to shape according to its own terms.

In this new navigational order which we are seeing emerging in the region, we have completely new lanes that are being used by commercial shipping,” she says.

 

Shrinking US aircraft carriers

The glory days of the world’s longest-serving aircraft carrier are over, reflecting fatigue in the broader US fleet amid a decline in the country’s shipbuilding capacity, according to official Chinese military analysts.

In a report on Wednesday, Chinese state broadcaster CCTV said the US Navy’s reliance on extended carrier deployments was a cause for concern, particularly in the case of the USS Nimitz.

The Nimitz was commissioned in 1975, making it the world’s longest-serving aircraft carrier still in active service, and its retirement has been pushed back repeatedly.

According to the US Navy, two aircraft operating from the Nimitz crashed in incidents in the South China Sea in October last year.

“Judging from the series of accidents that have occurred, the Nimitz is already being kept operational with difficulty. The glory days of the Nimitz aircraft carrier are over,” Li Yaqiang, a former senior colonel in the Chinese navy and a military commentator, said in an interview with CCTV.

The carrier was originally scheduled to be retired in 2026, but the US Navy said its decommissioning had been postponed until March next year to align with the expected delivery of the second Ford-class carrier, the USS John F. Kennedy.

“Once the Nimitz retires, any delay to the Ford-class carriers under construction would leave the fleet below the US legal requirement of 11 operational aircraft carriers,” the CCTV report said.

China’s most advanced aircraft carrier, the Fujian, enters service

Since 2006, US law has required that the US Navy’s maritime combat force include no fewer than 11 operational aircraft carriers.

CCTV military commentator Wei Dongxu also told the broadcaster that the US military’s carrier operations continued to be stretched “and it is now at a critical point in the transition between old and new aircraft carriers”.

“The Nimitz is too old and its technical state is no longer reliable enough, so it has to be retired. But the process of bringing the new Ford-class carriers into service has been plagued by problems,” Wei said.

Wei said unresolved problems with the introduction of the new US carriers could mean that the navy’s fleet of 11 aircraft carriers existed “largely on paper”.

“The combat capabilities of the first Ford-class carrier have still not been fully realized, and the F-35C, the important US carrier-borne fighter, has yet to be deployed aboard the ship,” he said.

“This means US carrier deployments must rely on a mix of new and ageing carriers, reducing its advantage at sea.”

Wei also said the problems were largely related to the decline of the US shipbuilding industry since the Cold War.

Extended maintenance cycles for US aircraft carriers are no longer uncommon. In 2017, the USS George Washington entered Newport News Shipbuilding for a planned four-year refuelling and complex overhaul, but it was not returned to the navy until May 2023, or two years after the intended deadline.

Meanwhile, the enormous scale of China’s shipbuilding industry has become a concern in Washington, joining technology, critical minerals and medical supply chains as areas in which US officials fear Beijing has gained a strategic advantage.

A Pentagon report released in December 2024 said the Chinese navy was the world’s largest numerically, with a battle force of more than 370 ships and submarines, including more than 140 major surface combatants. The report projected that the Chinese fleet would grow to 435 ships by 2030.

By comparison, the US Navy had 296 battle-force ships as of September 30, 2024. The fleet was projected to shrink further to 283 ships by 2027 as planned retirements outpaced the commissioning of new vessels.

 

United States the Biggest Arms Seller

Today, I am referring to the second blog US – The biggest Arm Seller I had posted, as a novice, on June 22, 2012. At times I wonder why people are still reading this. Even today it is among the top 20 blogs visited. 

I am one of the millions of people who fail to understand why conflicts are created and allowed to grow that often lead to anarchy, civil war and war among the countries.

If it is not taken as ‘self-praise’, I can see several reasons why a blog written in June 2012 would still attract readers today. Looking at it critically—both its strengths and weaknesses—I think its continued popularity is more about the theme rather than the accuracy of the predictions:

1. It Addresses a Timeless Question

The opening question—why conflicts are created and allowed to grow—remains relevant. Wars, insurgencies, regime changes, and geopolitical rivalries continue to dominate headlines. Readers searching for explanations often gravitate toward articles that challenge official narratives.

2. It Captures a Historical Turning Point

The blog was written during the aftermath of the Arab Spring. Events in Bahrain, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan were at the center of global attention. Today, many people revisit early commentary to see who "got it right" and who didn't.

3. The Arms Trade Remains a Hot Topic

My central argument that major powers benefit from arms sales while conflicts continue, still resonates. The world has since witnessed wars in Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan, and elsewhere, with defense spending reaching record levels. Readers often search for critiques of the military-industrial complex, and my title is highly searchable.

4. The Blog Raises Questions Rather Than Giving Definitive Answers

I repeatedly use phrases such as "one of the hypotheses," "one of the conspiracy theories," and "it is believed." This invites readers to think rather than simply accept a conclusion. Such content tends to have a longer shelf life.

My title, "US – The Biggest Arm Seller," contains keywords that people frequently search: 1) US arms sales, 2) biggest arms exporter, 3) Saudi Arabia weapons purchases, 4) Iran conflict, 5) Afghanistan and NATO Even after fourteen years, search engines can continue sending visitors to pages containing evergreen keywords.

I notice three shortcomings:

First, the article relies heavily on speculation without citing sources. Claims about future attacks on Pakistan and Iran, or military hardware being retained for future wars, are presented without evidence, the time proved both correct.

Second, it treats complex events largely through a single lens—great-power manipulation. Local political, ethnic, sectarian, and economic factors receive little attention, these also proved correct.

Third, some predictions did not materialize. Pakistan did not become the next major target after the NATO withdrawal, and several regional developments unfolded differently from what was anticipated.

My overall assessment is, the reason people still read this blog is probably not because every prediction proved correct. Rather, it reflects a persistent skepticism about great-power politics, arms sales, and interventionism.

Many readers continue to ask the same questions today that I raised in 2012. In that sense, the article has aged better as a commentary on geopolitical anxieties than as a forecast of future events.

For a novice blogger in 2012, it also displays something that has remained characteristic of my later writing: challenging dominant narratives and asking uncomfortable questions rather than merely repeating official positions. That is often what keeps an old article alive long after the news cycle has moved on.

Building Stronger and Sovereign Pakistan

As Pakistan celebrates another Independence Day, it is worth reflecting on what sovereignty means in the twenty-first century. It is no longer measured solely by territorial integrity or military capability. A truly sovereign nation is one that is food secure, economically resilient, financially stable and institutionally strong. It protects its borders while creating opportunities for its people, particularly its youth, whose aspirations will shape the country's future.

Pakistan has demonstrated remarkable resilience throughout its history. Despite geopolitical uncertainties, economic pressures and security challenges, the nation has preserved its independence, strengthened its strategic capabilities and developed institutions capable of safeguarding its national interests. These achievements provide a solid foundation for the next stage of national progress.

National security remains indispensable. Pakistan has maintained credible deterrence in a challenging regional environment, ensuring peace through strength. Recent conflicts elsewhere have also underscored an important lesson: military preparedness alone cannot guarantee lasting security. Sustainable national power rests equally on economic vitality, technological advancement, food security and social cohesion.

Pakistan's strategic location offers immense opportunities. Situated at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East and China, the country can serve as a vital hub for trade, energy and regional connectivity. Stronger economic cooperation with neighbouring countries, including Afghanistan, Iran and, whenever circumstances permit, India, can unlock new avenues for commerce, investment and shared prosperity.

Energy connectivity remains another strategic opportunity. Projects such as the Iran-Pakistan pipeline and the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline have the potential to strengthen Pakistan's energy security while generating transit revenues and promoting regional integration. Advancing such initiatives through constructive diplomacy would contribute to long-term economic stability.

Economic sovereignty is built upon sound fundamentals. Pakistan must continue reducing fiscal and trade imbalances while strengthening public confidence in institutions. Consistent policies, transparent governance and effective implementation are essential to creating an environment where businesses invest with confidence and innovation flourishes.

Food security deserves equal priority. Pakistan possesses fertile land, a hardworking farming community and extensive irrigation infrastructure. Yet recurring shortages of essential commodities highlight the need for modern storage facilities, efficient supply chains and timely policy decisions. Preventing post-harvest losses and improving agricultural productivity will strengthen both national food security and economic stability.

Agriculture as a whole requires renewed attention. Reviving cotton production through high-quality, disease-resistant seed varieties, modern farming practices and greater research support would benefit farmers, strengthen the textile industry and increase export earnings. Likewise, investment in value-added agriculture can transform Pakistan from an exporter of raw commodities into a supplier of high-value products.

Industrial modernization must also become a national priority. Upgrading oil refineries, encouraging technological innovation and expanding manufacturing capacity will reduce import dependence while creating skilled employment. Predictable policies and a stable regulatory environment will encourage both domestic and foreign investment, enabling industries to compete more effectively in global markets.

Pakistan's greatest asset is its people. A young and energetic population, growing digital capabilities, entrepreneurial talent and an expanding technology sector offer tremendous potential. By investing in education, vocational training, research and innovation, Pakistan can build a knowledge-based economy capable of competing in an increasingly technology-driven world.

The country's future prosperity will depend on partnerships between government, private enterprise and academia. Together they can promote productivity, encourage exports, strengthen infrastructure and create employment opportunities for millions of young Pakistanis. Sustainable economic growth will reinforce national resilience and enhance Pakistan's standing in the international community.

As the nation celebrates its independence, the objective should not merely be to preserve sovereignty but to strengthen it. Economic self-reliance, food security, technological advancement, regional connectivity and good governance are not separate goals; together they form the pillars of enduring national strength.

Pakistan has overcome formidable challenges before, and it possesses every ingredient needed to build a more prosperous future. With prudent policies, strong institutions and a shared national purpose, the country can transform its strategic advantages into lasting economic success. That is the path to a stronger, more confident and truly sovereign Pakistan.

*This article was originally published in Pakistan & Gulf Economist

 

 

PSX benchmark index closes almost flat

Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) remained under pressure during the week ended on August 13, 2026, primarily due to uncertainty surrounding the US-Iran deal and reopening of Strait of Hormuz. The benchmark index dropped by 1,325 points or 0.7%WoW to close at 180,105 on Thursday. However, market participation improved, with average daily traded volume increasing by 13%WoW to 1.1 billion share.

Oil prices remained elevated. Brent crude crossed US$90/ bbl mark during the week, up from last week’s close of US$84/ bbl, before correcting to current level of US$86/bbl.

Healthy corporate results and positive external and macro developments provided some support to investors’ confidence.

On last Friday, Pakistan signed a mutual defence agreement with Turkiye and Saudi Arabia, extending its earlier pact with the Royal Kingdom.

Fiscal deficit for FY26 was record at a low of 2.6% of GDP, while primary surplus at record high 2.9% of GDP, driven by higher tax revenue and lower markup expenses amid declining interest rates. Consequently, GoP’s debt recorded its lowest annual rise in two decades.

Workers’ remittances increased by 13%YoY to US$3.6 billion during July 2026.

On the sectoral front, auto sales increased by 74%YoY, supported by strong demand.

Other major news flow during the week included: 1) Pakistan to open new gateway for global oil suppliers, 2) FBR hints at withdrawing super tax, 3) Cotton crop satisfactory, rice beats target in Punjab, and 4) Minister calls for auto sector revival to meet US$63 billion export target.

Refinery and Oil & Gas Exploration emerged as top performing sectors, while Power, Fertilizer, and Technology remained laggards.

Major selling was recorded by Banks and Insurance companies with net sell of US$11.2 million and US$6.3 million. Individuals absorbed most of the selling with a net buy of US$16.3 million.

 

Top performing scrips were: CNERGY, PSEL, GAL, GHNI, and ATRL. On the flip side, laggards included: AICL, HUBC, BOP, TRG, and PAKT.

AKD Securities expects the market to improve on strengthening economic indicators amid easing geo political tensions, along with favorable financial results for the period ending June 20, 2026.

Additionally, a potential US-Iran deal could moderate international oil prices towards pre-conflict levels, further supporting sentiment. Market continues to trade at attractive valuations.

Top picks of the brokerage house include: OGDC, PPL, UBL, MEBL, HBL, FFC, ENGROH, PSO, LUCK, FCCL, INDU, ILP and SYS.

The Longer the War, the Weaker America

The bizarre war imposed by the United States and Israel on Iran on February 28 has continued for nearly six months, with no decisive outcome in sight. Pakistan-brokered negotiations have so far failed, largely because the objectives of the two sides appear fundamentally contradictory.

The implicit demand from Washington appears to be nothing short of Iran’s unconditional surrender. Tehran, however, has shown no willingness to capitulate. On the contrary, US efforts to bring Iran to its knees has demonstrated Iranian resilience and have transformed it into an even more formidable regional power.

Iran’s ability to inflict significant losses on US military bases in the Middle East and threaten strategic assets of America’s Arab allies appears to have strengthened with the passage of time. This has potentially altered the regional balance of power.

The Strait of Hormuz has consequently become the most critical pressure point. The US naval blockade and restrictions affecting access to the Red Sea cannot be viewed solely as an attempt to squeeze Iran economically. These also threaten the oil exports of Arab Gulf producers, creating an uncomfortable dilemma for America’s regional partners.

There is another dimension that deserves attention - the survival of US shale-oil producers. A prolonged conflict and the resulting disruption to Middle Eastern oil supplies can keep crude prices elevated. Many high-cost US shale producers could come under severe financial pressure if oil prices fall below around US$65 a barrel. This creates a possible economic incentive for Washington to avoid a rapid de-escalation.

Iran’s latest demands underline the widening gap between the two sides. Tehran has called for an end to the naval blockade, lifting of sanctions, withdrawal of US forces from the region and compensation for war-related losses. At the same time, Washington insists that diplomatic, economic and military pressure will continue until it secures what it considers an acceptable outcome.

But with every passing day, the strategic equation may be shifting: America is exhausting resources while Iran is gaining resilience, experience and leverage.

The greatest loser of this war could ultimately be the superpower itself. Further escalation risks damaging America’s credibility, encouraging Arab partners to reconsider existing security arrangements and intensifying pressure for the withdrawal of US forces from the region.

A superpower does not lose only when it is defeated on the battlefield; it can also lose when the cost of pursuing victory becomes greater than the benefits of achieving it.