Monday, 3 February 2025

Germany: The Sick Man of Europe

Recent data reveals that growth eluded the German economy for the second consecutive year in 2024. However, these woes run deeper, as the economy has roughly stagnated since 2020. With the country gearing up for federal elections this February, all eyes are on potential policy changes—spoiler alert, they’re likely to be limited. Below is a look at the key challenges facing the German economy and our panelists’ outlook going forward.

Two fundamental pillars of the German economy have been rocked over the past years: Cheap energy prices and easy access to large export markets. In 2019, the country’s electricity prices were among the lowest in the EU, but in 2023 German electricity prices had more than doubled due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

This reversal of fortunes shook the key industrial sector, which is expect to shrink further for the fourth straight year in 2025. Meanwhile, China’s rising share in markets formerly dominated by German firms—such as automobiles—and a likely increase in trade barriers to both the Chinese and US markets threaten external demand. Together, China and the US absorb around 16% of German exports.

Deteriorating infrastructure, lagging digitalization efforts, the government’s collapse… the list of the economy’s domestic woes goes on, but the culprit, it turns out, is the same: The federal debt brake. This measure caps the state’s net borrowing at 0.35% of GDP annually to contain the public-debt-to-GDP ratio.

Though, successful in its primary aim—Germany has the lowest such ratio among G7 countries—it has had the unfortunate side effect of limiting public investment at a time when it’s desperately needed.

Add to that excessive red tape constraining private investment, and the result is crumbling international competitiveness; according to a report by the Institute for Management Development, Germany has dropped nine places to 24th in the global competitiveness rankings in the past two years. Reforms to the debt brake require a two-thirds majority in Parliament, and are opposed by the two front-runners for the February elections. As a result, such reforms are likely a pipedream.

Though Covid-19 was successfully contained in 2021, households were plagued for a prolonged period afterwards by weak consumer sentiment, declining real wages and elevated interest rates. Heading into 2025, real income growth should pick up, which together with further rate cuts by the ECB will support consumer spending. Still, spending growth will be below the Euro average amid rising unemployment and persistent consumer negativity—in part due to lingering political uncertainty.

The Consensus is currently for the economy to post a shallow rebound in 2025 as lower interest rates and inflation drive improvements in private spending and fixed investment, and stronger EU demand fuels a recovery in exports. Still, Germany will again claim the title of the G7’s worst performer this year, held down by protracted malaise in the key industrial sector.

According to ING’s Carsten Brzeski, “The country is still one of the richest economies in the world, but it needs an overhaul to stop its gradual deterioration. Just addressing the main issues will be a challenge. Add to this unfavourable demographics and the impact on healthcare and pension systems and it’s clear that there is no easy way out of the current situation. In the absence of any new policy initiatives after the elections, the German economy looks set for another year of stagnation and possibly even a third consecutive contraction. A sad new record.”

Friedrich Schaper and Sven Jari Stehn, analysts at Goldman Sachs, said, “The early elections therefore provide an opportunity to tackle Germany’s many economic challenges. While some additional fiscal support seems likely, we believe any fiscal expansion is going to be limited in size, focus mostly on investment and support growth meaningfully only from 2026. Decisive structural reforms could boost Germany’s growth prospects—as they did in the early 2000s—but likewise take time to implement, leaving a weak growth outlook for 2025.”

Courtesy: Focuseconomics

 

 

Saturday, 1 February 2025

Trump announces to end Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump announced on Friday that his administration has already engaged in "very serious" discussions with Russia regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine, hinting that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin could soon take "significant" steps toward ending the conflict, reports the Saudi Gazette.

“We will be speaking, and I think we will perhaps do something significant,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “We want to end that war. That war would have not started if I was president.”

While Trump did not disclose which members of his administration have been in contact with Russia, he insisted that "talks are already happening."

When asked whether he had personally spoken with Putin, he remained evasive, stating, “I don’t want to say that.”

Since his return to the White House, Trump has been vocal in his criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, arguing that he should have negotiated with Putin to prevent the war.

In a Fox News interview earlier in January, Trump ridiculed Zelenskyy, stating, “They were brave, but we gave them billions of dollars,” in reference to the extensive US military and economic aid sent to Kyiv.

Putin, for his part, recently praised Trump in an interview with Russian state television, describing him as a "clever and pragmatic man" who prioritizes US interests.

The Russian leader claimed that if Trump had remained in office, the war in Ukraine might have been avoided. “We always had a business-like, pragmatic but also trusting relationship,” Putin remarked.

The Russian president also echoed Trump’s unsubstantiated claims about the 2020 US election, saying that the Ukraine crisis might never have happened had Trump not been "robbed" of victory.

However, multiple courts, federal and local officials, former campaign staffers, and even Trump's former attorney general have all dismissed any claims of election fraud.

Trump has frequently promised a swift resolution to the war if re-elected, while criticizing President Joe Biden’s administration for its financial and military support of Ukraine. His relationship with Putin has been under scrutiny since his 2016 presidential campaign when he publicly called on Russia to release missing emails belonging to his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.

Trump has also been criticized for siding with Putin over US intelligence officials regarding Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and has previously described the Russian president as “pretty smart” for his invasion of Ukraine.

Arabs reject displacement of Gazans

Amid rising concerns over the potential forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, the six-party Arab ministerial meeting in Cairo reaffirmed its categorical rejection of any such move and emphasized the need for the full implementation of the ceasefire agreement, reports Saudi Gazette.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the ministers reiterated their commitment to working with US President Donald Trump’s administration to achieve a two-state solution, stressing the importance of a sustainable ceasefire that ensures the safe and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid to all parts of Gaza.

The meeting also underscored support for ongoing mediation efforts led by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States to ensure the phased execution of the ceasefire agreement and the eventual achievement of full de-escalation.

Ministers called for the removal of all obstacles hindering entry of humanitarian relief, shelter supplies, and essential materials needed for Gaza's recovery and reconstruction.

Additionally, the ministers rejected any attempts to limit the role of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), stressing the urgent need for a comprehensive reconstruction plan for Gaza.

They urged the international community and the UN Security Council to uphold the two-state solution and dismissed any plans to divide the Gaza Strip, reiterating the necessity of an Israeli withdrawal.

The Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that the Cairo discussions focused on ensuring the continuation of the ceasefire, strengthening the Palestinian Authority’s governance capabilities, facilitating the safe return of displaced residents to their homes, and increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza.

This high-level meeting came just days after President Trump proposed relocating Palestinians from Gaza to neighboring countries, such as Egypt and Jordan, a suggestion that was swiftly rejected by both nations and met with opposition from various Arab and international actors.

The discussions also followed Israel’s recent decision to ban UNRWA operations in Israel and occupied East Jerusalem as of Thursday, a move that has been widely condemned as having "catastrophic consequences" for Palestinian refugees.

Attending the Cairo meeting were Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdel Aty, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, and Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani. Also present were Hussein Al-Sheikh, Secretary-General of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Executive Committee, and Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit.

 

Friday, 31 January 2025

New tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China

According to Saudi Gazette, US President Donald Trump will impose new tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China starting Saturday, marking a significant escalation in global trade tensions.

The tariffs will include a 25% duty on Mexican and Canadian imports and a 10% tariff on Chinese goods.

However, Trump stated on Friday that Canadian oil would face a reduced tariff of 10%, set to take effect on February 18.

Trump also signaled potential future tariffs on the European Union, accusing the bloc of unfair treatment toward the United States.

"These are promises made and promises kept by the President," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, justifying the Mexico and Canada tariffs as a response to what she described as their role in the distribution of illegal fentanyl in the United States.

The president has frequently cited undocumented migration and trade imbalances with neighboring countries as key reasons for the tariffs.

During his campaign, Trump had threatened to impose tariffs of up to 60% on Chinese goods but has so far held off on immediate action, instead directing his administration to conduct further analysis.

US imports from China have remained flat since 2018, following a series of tariffs imposed during Trump’s first term.

However, concerns are mounting that renewed trade restrictions could trigger a wider trade conflict and drive up costs for American consumers.

In response to the tariffs, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau warned that Canada would retaliate if the US moves forward with the new levies.

"It's not what we want, but if he moves forward, we will also act," Trudeau said.

Both Canada and Mexico have indicated they will implement countermeasures while also working to reassure Washington that they are addressing US border concerns.

Chinese officials have also urged against protectionist measures, with Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang calling for a "win-win" approach to trade during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. While he did not mention the US by name, his comments underscored China's concerns about a renewed trade war under Trump's presidency.

The new tariffs come as the US relies heavily on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, which together accounted for 40% of all goods brought into the country last year. If tariffs on Canadian and Mexican oil imports are enforced, they could undermine Trump’s promise to lower the cost of living, potentially raising prices on fuel and consumer goods.

Trump acknowledged on Friday that tariffs could lead to short-term economic disruption, as costs are often passed along to businesses and consumers. 

PSX witnesses 29%WoW decline in daily trading volume

Pakistan Stock Exchange witnessed volatility throughout the week, largely influenced by corporate earnings announcements. During the week, the benchmark KSE-100 index shed 625 points or 0.54% to close at 114,256 points on Friday, January 31, 2025.

Fertilizer stocks weighed heavily on the benchmark index, following FFC’s lower-than-expected profitability. However, this was partially offset by higher-than-expected final dividends by the banks.

The week begun with State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) cutting the policy rate by 100bps to 12% amid a continued disinflationary trend.

Additionally, SBP revised its inflation forecast for FY25 to range between 5.5% to 7.5%, significantly lower than the earlier projections of 11.5% to 13.5%.

The central bank also changed its current account balance forecast to a range of a 0.5% surplus to a 0.5% deficit of GDP in FY25 as against an earlier estimate of a nominal deficit.

Meanwhile, ahead of the IMF review, authorities met another condition by notifying a gas price increase for captive power producers to PKR3,500/ mmbtu.

Market participation dropped to 15-week low, with an average daily traded volume of 498 million shares, down 29%WoW.

Foreign exchange reserves held by SBP declined by US$76 million to US$11.4 billion as of January 24, 2025.

The domestic currency weakened marginally against the greenback to PKR278.95 to a US$.

Major news flow during the week included: 1) Reko Diq deal with Saudi firm nearing finalization, 2) Only 3,651 individuals file taxable income greater than PKR100 million, 3) SBP injects PKR523.7 billion through open market operations, and 4) Weekly SPI inflation eases multi-year low at 0.44%YoY.

Textile Weaving, Automobile Assembler, and Banks were amongst the top performers, while OMCs, Engineering, and Refinery sectors were among the laggards.

Major selling was recorded by Banks and Foreigners with a net sell of US$10.4 million. Companies, Other organizations and Individuals absorbed most of the selling with a net buy of US$10.5 million.

Top performers of the week were: ATLH, NBP, KTML, AKBL, and BAHL, while the laggards included: ISL, SNGP, UNITY, AGP, and KOSM. 

According to AKD Securities, the market is expected to remain positive, with short-term market momentum largely following the upcoming corporate results.

Over the medium term, the KSE-100 index is anticipated to sustain its upward momentum through CY25, primarily driven by the strong profitability of fertilizer companies, higher sustainable RoEs of banks, and improving cash flows of E&Ps and OMCs, benefitting from falling interest rates.

Thursday, 30 January 2025

Iran foreign policy must not be dictated by US

Iran’s Vice President for Strategic Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif, stated, "I do not see the United States as an opportunity for Iran's foreign policy. I consider the US a nuisance or a shackle that must be removed from Iran's foreign policy."

In his speech at a recent conference on international relations and geopolitics, Zarif referenced discussions from the 55th World Economic Forum (Davos 2025).

He noted that the theme of "the return of hard power," with a focus on Donald Trump's re-election as President of the United States, dominated many discussions.

Zarif highlighted a common sentiment among attendees, "Take Donald Trump, the new President of the United States, seriously but not literally."

“The 47th US President seeks to revive American hard power using economic leverage rather than military tools,” he noted.

Zarif also addressed the notion that a polarized world requires loyalty.

He mentioned that some attendees believed Trump divides the world into smaller countries and peer countries.

"Trump expects loyalty from smaller countries but not from those on par with the United States," Zarif said.

Discussing the post-polar world, the former foreign minister noted that some attendees believed Europe desires relative American hegemony, but Trump does not.

Others emphasized that loyalty is not a consistent factor in Trump's calculations, raising serious doubts about its stability.

Zarif added that a new international polarization would not emerge soon.

Some view this situation as a form of chaos, but Zarif argued that it signifies a new international condition where "temporary issue-based coalitions" replace "permanent polarizations."

He explained that the absence of loyalty could be interpreted within these temporary coalitions, which might last longer depending on their purpose and goals.

The official emphasized that Iran has an opportunity in this situation that must be seized.

He stated that some outside Iran, including Zionists and certain Iranian opposition groups, aim to solidify the perception that Iran is at its weakest and most dangerous.

This perception was so ingrained that a high-ranking European official repeatedly claimed during a Davos session that Iran “has been weakened.”

Zarif responded, "Assuming your statement is correct and Iran has weakened, you and your like-minded colleagues can no longer claim that Iran disrupts West Asia’s peace because, according to you, we lack the power to do so."

Zarif insisted that the reason for the lack of harmony in West Asia is not Iran but the unresolved Palestinian issue.

Zarif continued, "The second point they emphasize is that Iran, allegedly 'weakened,' now faces fewer options, with the only remaining option for Tehran being nuclear weapons.”

“They argue that before Iran can move towards production, we must prevent it with military action,” he added.

However, Zarif noted that Trump's recent statements suggest he is not entirely convinced by these arguments. 

In response to questions, Zarif agreed that Iran's foreign policy should start regionally but stressed the need to remove the US as an obstacle.

"I do not see the US as an opportunity for Iran's foreign policy. I consider the US a nuisance or a shackle that must be removed from Iran's foreign policy," he reiterated.

"We do not need to establish friendly relations with the US Instead, we must ensure that others do not feel they must fight the US when they engage with us, as this will deter them from choosing us," he concluded.

 

Tuesday, 28 January 2025

Trump dancing to Zionist drumbeat

US President Donald Trump's insistence on the proposal to relocate Palestinians from the Gaza Strip evidently reflects his alignment with the expansionist aspirations of Zionist ideologies. Trump reiterated his suggestion while trying to initiate a charm offensive directed at the Palestinian people. He added that Cairo and Amman will comply with his request to take in Palestinians. 

“I want them to live in a place without violence. Gaza has been hell for so many years. They can live in much better and more comfortable areas,” Trump said while referring to Israel’s devastating war on the Palestinian territory. 

On Saturday, Trump floated the idea of transferring Gazans to Egypt and Jordan to “clean out” the enclave. 

 “It is literally a demolition site right now, almost everything is demolished and people are dying there. So, I would rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing in a different location, where they can maybe live in peace for a change,” he said. 

Jordan and Egypt have issued official statements rejecting the removal of Palestinians from Gaza.

Trump’s idea is in line with those Israeli politicians who have consistently supported the mass relocation of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip and the reestablishment of Jewish settlements in the territory.

In October 2024, former National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir called for reestablishing settlements in Gaza and “encouraging emigration” of the strip’s 2.3 million population. 

“If we want to we can renew settlement in Gaza…We can [also] do something else – encourage emigration. Israel is giving them (Palestinians) the option of going to other countries,” the far-right minister, who resigned following the establishment of a ceasefire in Gaza said.

The ceasefire between Israel and Hamas took effect on January 19 after Israel failed to “destroy” the Palestinian resistance groups following more than a 15-month conflict.  

Israel launched a genocidal war on Gaza on October 07, 2023, killing more than 47,000 Palestinians including some 17,000 children. 

Israeli intentions extend beyond the reoccupation of Gaza to include the annexation of the occupied West Bank.

Following Trump’s reelection as the US president in the November 2024 election, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich suggested the regime would look to annex the West Bank in 2025. 

“2025: the year of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria,” the far-right minister said, using the biblical name by which Israel refers to the West Bank.

Days after the US presidential election, Smotrich hoped that the Trump administration would recognize Israel’s push for “sovereignty” over the occupied territory.

"I am convinced that we will be able to work closely together with President-elect Trump and all members of the incoming administration, to promote the common values and interests of the two countries, to strengthen the strength and security of the State of Israel, to expand the circle of peace and stability in the Middle East out of strength and faith and on the basis of recognition in the unquestionable historical belonging of the whole Land of Israel to the people of Israel," Smotrich said.

Trump moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem (al-Quds) during his first term (January 20, 2017 – January 20, 2021). He also proposed a plan that would have cemented Israeli control over al-Quds and protected settlements in the West Bank. This is while all Israeli settlements are illegal under international law. 

From now on, it seems that Trump will likely align his objectives with those of Smotrich and similar figures.

Mike Huckabee, Trump's nominee to be the next US ambassador to Israel, is a strong advocate for the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank.

Huckabee told the Associated Press when he was running to be the Republican presidential nominee in 2015 that if elected, his administration would formally recognize the West Bank as part of Israel.

The Israeli army attempted to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Gaza, but it failed to do so amid rising resistance. 

Meanwhile, Israel has intensified deadly assaults on the West Bank as it seeks to implement its malevolent plans in the occupied territory.  

But Palestinians have shown that they will fight tooth and nail against the Israeli army that is armed to the teeth.