Subrahmanyam Jaishankar is the first career diplomat to
serve as India's external affairs minister. Unlike many of his predecessors, he
has also had experience in the private sector, serving as president of global
corporate affairs for the Tata Group for about a year just before taking up his
current role.
His unique background, coupled with the "Make in
India" and "Atmanirbhar Bharat" driven by the administration of
Prime Minister Narendra Modi to promote foreign investment and self-reliance,
respectively, are reshaping Indian foreign policy.
Indian
neutral position on Russian invasion of Ukraine has been the subject of
considerable debate and discussions in media and policy circles. Many experts
have attributed India's stance to its Cold War-era policy of nonalignment and
its bonhomie with Russia, which dates back to those days.
The Indian government has justified its position as serving
the country's national interests, rather than being a consequence of ideology.
Its real geo-economic considerations go beyond realpolitik.
Unlike preceding administrations, the Modi government is not
seeking to have one foot with the global South and one with the West in
deference to the principle of nonalignment, nor is it motivated by what its
developed-country partners call shared values.
Rather, behind the veneer of India's balancing act are trade
and economic interests, particularly in terms of energy, defense,
pharmaceuticals and high technology.
India
is now poised to be the fastest-growing major economy this year, with the
International Monetary Fund last week forecasting a gross-domestic product rise
of 6.8%. This would be more than double the pace of China or the world as a
whole at a time when developed countries look poised to enter recession.
Many economists have attributed India's strong growth to
rising domestic consumption and its relative success at controlling inflation.
But notably, the Indian finance ministry credits purchases of discounted
Russian oil as a key factor in the country's strong macroeconomic performance.
Beyond
cheap oil, India is also taking advantage of the growing geopolitical fractures
to sell more arms abroad, increase space cooperation and develop markets for
its pharmaceuticals.
Latin America has been a particular new area of focus, with
the government setting up new consulates in Paraguay and the Dominican Republic
and a state-owned fuel retailer looking to Brazil's Petrobras for supplies.
Visiting Argentina last month, Jaishankar pointedly used
that country's name for the Falkland Islands, Islas Malvinas. This was not just
a show of solidarity with a fellow member of the global South but part of
a sales pitch for the Tejas fighter jet made by state-owned Hindustan
Aeronautics.
Buenos
Aires aims by year-end to finalize a decision between competing models,
including offers for the US F-16, Russia's MiG-35, and the JF-17 made jointly
by China and Pakistan.
The
Tejas is billed as an affordable alternative to the F-16 and other Western
fighters, and even to the JF-17. Priced at US$42 million a plane with an
operating cost of around US$4,000 an hour, the Tejas is the cheapest
lightweight combat aircraft available.
Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh promoted the Tejas on
a visit to Egypt last month and other ministers have been traveling to the
country as well. Hindustan Aeronautics is preparing to open its first overseas
marketing office in Malaysia and considering adding others.
The Philippines, meanwhile, earlier this year finalized a US$375
million deal to buy supersonic BrahMos missiles from the Defence Research and
Development Organisation (DRDO), another Indian state-owned arms producer.
Vietnam is also a target market for Indian defense companies.
Indian
arms makers have other advantages besides price over their established American
rivals in pitching to countries in the global South. US arms makers are
handcuffed by Washington's alliance policies, which fracture the world into
camps. Thus the DRDO is working on a deal to sell Pinaka Mark-II guided missile
systems to Armenia, a longtime Russian ally.
India's participation in the new I2U2 grouping with Israel,
the US and the United Arab Emirates also shows how economic interests are
taking precedence over past ideological priorities, in this case, support for
the Palestinian cause.
That
effort now yields little economic benefit for New Delhi while the I2U2 in July
set plans for a US$2 billion series of food-sector industrial parks in India
and a US$330 million renewable energy project in Modi's home state of Gujarat.
Modi's vision of "Make in India, make for the
world" still faces many hurdles, including the country's aversion to free
trade deals and other protectionist policies, but turning top government
officials into business development managers charged with cultivating foreign
markets is one way to advance the effort.
Indian
concept of a multipolar world can be more than geopolitical balancing between
global powers but also a geoeconomic endeavor carefully crafted to take
advantage of different opportunities in each country.