United States portrayal of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

As negotiations between the world powers and the Islamic Republic of Iran continues over the revival of the 2015 nuclear agreement, the last barrier to a deal is, Tehran’s demand for the United States to remove its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from the foreign terrorist organization (FTO) list.

Naturally, this demand has triggered a heated debate in Washington between proponents and opponents. Proponents of such a move — including Khamal Kharrazi, former Iranian foreign minister — claim the IRGC does not belong on the FTO list as it is a national army that is no different from Saudi Arabia’s National Guard.

By contrast, opponents argue that removing the IRGC from the FTO list would legitimize an entity that has the characteristics of a terrorist organization and engages in widespread acts of terrorism.

A research prepared by a US Think-tank reveals that the nature of IRGC is not a conventional state armed force and should not be treated as such. The IRGC is an ideological organization that shares key characteristics with other designated Islamist organizations, including its quest for an expansionist Islamic state, a global Islamic order, forceful imposition of sharia law (Shi’a interpretation), militaristic concept of jihad, and anti-American and anti-Semitic ideology.

The finding of a US research paper reveals three visible trends in the IRGC. The first relates to indoctrination becoming an increasing focal point in the Guard. Sayyid Ali Hosseini Khamenei and his hardline circle have sought to nurture a more radical IRGC generation by dedicating more time to ideological indoctrination of its members. The promotion system within the ranks of the IRGC also favors ideological conviction over technical expertise, ensuring the most zealous members rise up within the chain of command.

The second trend relates to the increasing priority given to Mahdism within the IRGC’s ideology. From the post-2009 period onwards, the doctrine of Mahdism has become one of the main prisms through which the IRGC and affiliated hardline clerics would understand the world around them and the IRGC’s actions, as well as communicate that understanding. In turn, there has been greater emphasis on viewing the IRGC as the military vehicle to prepare the foundations for the reappearance of the 12th Imam, with policy objectives such as hostility toward the US and the eradication of Israel being understood through this prism. This is consistent with the goal of Khamenei and his hardline allies, such as Ayatollah Alamalhouda, the supreme leader’s representative to Khorasan and President Ebrahim Raisi’s father-in-law, to transform the concept of Mahdism from a set of feelings into an “ideological belief.”

The third and final trend relates to the IRGC’s younger generations becoming more radical and extreme. In this regard, efforts by Khamenei and the Guard’s Ideological-Political Organization to nurture a more radical generation among the IRGC has paid, and is paying, dividends.

Against this backdrop, the rise of devout followers of the militaristic doctrine of Mahdism among the senior ranks of the IRGC is not inconceivable and should not be ruled out. While there is hope that the IRGC’s senior leadership will act pragmatically, internal structures within the Guard — including its indoctrination and promotion system — certainly open up the possibility that devoted Mahdists could occupy senior leadership positions.

Such a scenario could have far-reaching consequences as it would bring the three pillars of the IRGC’s foreign policy — militias, ballistic missiles, and the nuclear program — under their control. Even if a small number of devout Mahdists occupy senior positions in the Guard, it is possible that they may seek to facilitate and speed up the return of Mahdi. This would have major implications for some of the policies that are being understood through the prism of Mahdism, such as Israel’s existence being the “greatest barrier” to the reappearance of the 12th Imam.

At present the doctrine of Mahdism in the IRGC remains a complete blind spot for Western policymakers, yet it could have major implications for the Islamic Republic’s militia network, ballistic missile program, and even its nuclear program. Of course, no one knows for sure if devout adherents of the ideology will attain senior command positions in the IRGC. The objective of this paper, however, is simply to point out that it would be unwise not to prepare for this scenario given the huge implications it would have for US and global security.

Russia-Ukraine conflict paves way for free trade agreements among EU members

Russia’s war with Ukraine is giving member countries of the European Union fresh incentives to speed up work on free-trade agreements. At least nine nations including Germany and Spain are planning to send a letter to the EU seeking to speed the delayed talks, according to a Bloomberg report.

The signatories want faster negotiations with New Zealand, Australia, India and Indonesia, while speeding the implementation of accords agreed with Chile, Mexico and the Mercosur bloc of countries, which include Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay.  

The letter also says that the process to negotiate, sign and implement trade deals is too long, and points out that the massive Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership was signed in late 2020 and will enter into force this year for most members.

In Brussels, a slow-moving trade bureaucracy has often been displaced and made irrelevant by quicker political developments.

For example, in 2016 a transatlantic trade deal negotiated during the Obama administration tanked after Donald Trump’s election reversed the trajectory of US-EU trade liberalization efforts.

Then in late 2020 the EU announced the conclusion of its seven-year investment negotiations with China, only to see it promptly belly flop after Brussels clashed with Beijing over its alleged human-rights abuses in Xinjiang.

Trade agreements take time to complete and sometimes span the length of entire careers, which makes it understandably frustrating to see years of hard work go down the drain.

Now Russia’s invasion is hastening a fundamental rewiring of the global economy that is reinforcing existing trade ties among geopolitical allies and incentivizing new ones. It’ll play out in the months ahead through business decisions about supply chains and government deal-making.

“In a post-invasion world, it has become increasingly untenable to isolate trade from universal values such as respect for international law and human rights,” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said in a speech last month.

Shifts are occurring from dependence to diversification, from efficiency to security, and from globalization to regionalization, she said.

In Russia, businesses and the government may already be substituting imports from Europe with imports from Asia, according to Vincent Stamer, head of the Kiel Trade Indicator.

The Russian port of Novorossiysk in the Black Sea has recently seen a significant increase in the number of container ships arriving, whereas the port of St. Petersburg, which is involved in European trade, continues to record declines, Stamer said in a post Thursday.

“This could be a first indication of trade diversion” and “makes it all the more important to create economic incentives for countries such as India to move closer to Europe rather than Russia,” he added.

 

Iranian port Chabahar handles nearly 2 million tons goods in a year

As announced by a provincial official, nearly 2 million tons of basic commodities were transported from Chabahar port, in the southeast of Iran, to the designated destinations throughout the country in the past Iranian calendar year 1400 ended in March 2022.

Mehrollah Damough, the head of goods transportation office of Road Maintenance and Transportation Department of Sistan-Baluchestan province, where the strategic port lies, said that the mentioned commodities were transported by almost 80,000 trucks.

Chabahar is an important port and a low-cost route for Central Asian countries, which with its strategic unloading and loading equipment has the potential to become a key transit corridor for international transit and transportation, the official further underlined.

As announced by the Deputy Head of Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA), 30.9 million tons of basic goods worth US$19.6 billion were cleared from the customs in the past Iranian calendar year.

Foroud Asgari, Deputy Head of IRICA for customs affairs, said that the imported goods comprises of 25 commodity groups.

Putting the value of the imported basic commodities at US$19.6 billion in the past year, the official said that the imports showed a 60% increase in terms of value and 32% growth in terms of weight, as compared to the Iranian calendar year 1399.

As Iran's only oceanic port on the Gulf of Oman, Chabahar port holds great significance for the country both politically and economically. The country has taken serious measures for developing this port in order to improve the country’s maritime trade.

In this regard, the Islamic Republic has been welcoming investors from all over the world to take part in the development of this port and benefit from its distinguished position as a trade hub in the region.

Chabahar port consists of Shahid Kalantari and Shahid Beheshti terminals, each of which has five berth facilities. The port is located in Iran’s Sistan-Balouchestan Province and is about 120 kilometers southwest of Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, where the China-funded Gwadar port is situated.

In May 2016, India, Iran, and Afghanistan had signed a trilateral agreement for the strategically-located Chabahar to give New Delhi access to Kabul and Central Asia.

Based on an agreement with Iran, India is going to install and operate modern loading and unloading equipment including mobile harbor cranes in Shahid Beheshti Port in Chabahar.

Miftah the lesser you talk the better it will be for you and the incumbent government

The consensus is growing among the analysts that Miftah Ismail, Finance Minister of Pakistan talks a lot and often inconsistent and incoherent, which could make his life miserable with the passage of time. 

The other suggestion is that he should bid farewell to Imran Khan animosity and focus on putting the economy of the country back on track.

Allow me to refer to his statement regarding Dr. Reza Baqir, the outgoing Governor of State Bank of Pakistan. Ismail had indicated in a tweet that the government would not be providing an extension to Dr. Baqir. It may be called that he was often termed an appointee of the International Monetary Fund and follower of the IMF dictate.

However, on his departure he admitted, "I want to thank Reza for his service to Pakistan. He is an exceptionally qualified man and we worked well during our brief time together. I wish him the very best."

He misses no chance of maligning Imran Khan for agreeing with the IMF on conditions which had opened floodgate of inflation in Pakistan, the most notorious being the hike in the tariffs of electricity and gas and withdrawal of different types of subsidies.

It is a welcome sign that the IMF has extended the timeline of the current program and also promised to increase the amount by US$2 billion. However, the honourable minister hasn’t disclosed the conditions attached to this ‘favour’. The cat will soon come out of the bag when the IMF starts its review soon after Eid Holidays.

Even a person of ordinary wit knows very well that IMF bailout package will be attached with: hike in revenue, hike in electricity and gas tariffs and withdrawal of subsidies. It is also no wonder that Miftah hasn’t developed ‘homegrown’ plan and would be obliged to follow the IMF recipe.

I am not sure if the Minister is fully aware of massive smuggling of food items to the three neighboring countries, enjoying long and most porous borders with Pakistan. Food items are being fled to Afghanistan, Iran and India only because of the faulty Trade Policy being followed by Pakistan.

Ismail faces a daunting challenge of controlling mounting ‘circular debt’, which is nothing but rampant pilferage going on with the connivance of employees of the utility companies. Analysts say, with every hike in tariffs the incentive grows for pilfering electrify and gas.

Minister has to convince IMF that Pakistan suffers from cost pushed inflation and the hike in interest rate renders the exporters uncompetitive in the global markets. Exports just can’t be increased without exploiting Pakistan’s comparative advantage and making exports competitive in the global markets.

Last but not the least, Pakistan has to contain import of luxury and/or unnecessary goods to contain trade deficit. WTO Article 6 provides an option to Pakistan to impose quantitative restrictions on imports; the option must be exercised without further waste of time.

Welcome Dr. Murtaza Syed as Governor State Bank of Pakistan

With three-year term of Dr. Reza Baqir as Governor, State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) coming to an end on May 04, 2022, Dr. Murtaza Syed, the senior most Deputy Governor takes over as Governor of the central bank.

Dr.  Syed an eminently qualified economist with rich experience of dealing with International Monetary Fund (IMF) will oversee the affairs of SBP and will be part of Pakistani team negotiating with the IMF, until the Government of Pakistan formally appoints new Governor of SBP.

According to the SBP, Dr. Syed has more than 20 years of experience in macroeconomic research and policy making and worked with the IMF for 16 years before resigning to join the State Bank of Pakistan. Dr. Syed has a PhD in economics from Nuffield College at the University of Oxford and has delivered lectures on public policy at Cambridge and Oxford Universities.

Earlier Finance Minister, Miftah Ismail had indicated in a tweet that the government would not be providing an extension to Dr, Reza Baqir.

"I want to thank Reza for his service to Pakistan. He is an exceptionally qualified man and we worked well during our brief time together. I wish him the very best," the minister had added.

Following Ismail's announcement, Dr. Baqir, in a series of tweets, thanked Allah and his fellow team members for giving him a chance to serve in the public office. "To other fellow Pakistanis, especially overseas, I encourage you to consider public service," he said.

The former governor also recalled the initiatives the SBP took during his tenure, such as Covid relief packages which included Rozgar payroll loans and hospital financing, Roshan Digital Account, Raast, a framework to licence digital banks in Pakistan, financial inclusion for women, affordable mortgages for lower-income groups and others.

"I want to especially thank Deputy Governors and SBP Corporate Management Team for your teamwork and support. I also want to thank the 4 Finance Ministers and 5 Finance Secretaries I worked with over my 3 years," he continued.

Dr. Baqir said that Pakistan faced several challenges but also possessed "great strengths" to counter them. "I am confident and hopeful that we as a country will make the right choices to overcome the challenges ahead of us," he added.

Meanwhile, the news of Dr. Baqir's term has termed as "loss for Pakistan" by politicians and analysts on Twitter.

Pakistan foreign policy always subservient to US mantra

In today’s blog I am daring to negate an impression created by an article written by Ms Maleeha Lodi (Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United States, United Kingdom and United Nations) and published in Pakistan’s leading English newspaper. I am taking an extreme position by saying, “Pakistan’s foreign policy has always remained subservient to the US mantra”.

Please allow me to begin with the U2 incident, when the US pilot-less planes used to takeoff from a Pakistani airbase near Peshawar for spying USSR. At one point the situation got so nasty that USSR threatened to attack Pakistan.

Badaber: A secret US intelligence facility in Pakistan

In July 1958, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower requested permission from the Pakistani Prime Minister Feroze Khan Noon for the United States to establish a secret intelligence facility in Pakistan and for the U-2 spyplane to fly from Pakistan. The U-2 flew at altitudes that could not be reached by Soviet fighter jets of the era; it was believed to be beyond the reach of Soviet missiles as well. A facility established in Badaber (Peshawar Air Station), 10 miles (16 km) from Peshawar, was a cover for a major communications intercept operation run by the United States National Security Agency (NSA). Badaber was an excellent location because of its proximity to Soviet central Asia. This enabled the monitoring of missile test sites, key infrastructure and communications. The U-2 "spy-in-the-sky" was allowed to use the Pakistan Air Force section of Peshawar Airport to gain vital photo intelligence in an era before satellite observation.

I would also invite the readers to recall last-minute cancellation of the visit of Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan to USSR and going to the United States around the same dates.

This also reminds me the US ditching Pakistan at the time of creation of Bangladesh. State-owned Pakistani media kept on telling the US feet could arrive any minute, which never arrived. This creates an impression that the US supported creation of Bangladesh.

Now coming to Afghan proxy war, Pakistan played two opposite roles: first it supported Taliban in averting USSR attack in a quest to reach warm water and then supporting US/Nato troops in crushing the same Taliban.

Please also allow me to share conspiracy theory, “Pakistan and United States have enjoyed cordial relationships due military rule”. The readers are invited to read details of Ayub, Zia and Musharraf eras.

I am also inclined to share another public opinion, The US-Pakistan relationship is a saga of ‘Marriage of Convenience’.

It is often said, ‘Pakistan is a frontline allay of United States in war against terrorism’. Some analysts interpret it ‘Pakistan is partner in proxy wars but when it comes to Investment and trade India is the US darling’.

I tend to subscribe to this theory based on my follow up of the construction of Chabahar Port in Iran. Despite economic sanctions on Iran, India invested millions of dollars in the construction of this port and allied road and rail links to connect with Afghanistan and Central Asian states. Please also note that Pakistan was not allowed to import oil from Iran during this period.

The United States was more than smart in facilitating India in the construction of Chabahar Port and allied infrastructure. The prime US motive was to create an alternative access to land-locked Afghanistan, extended to Central Asian states.

But the real objective was to undermine Pakistan’s importance in Afghan transit trade. There is no denying to the fact that Pakistan still offers cost effective and shortest route to Afghanistan.

Before I conclude let me say, “Pakistan under the influence of the United States has not recognized Taliban Government in Afghanistan”. While Afghans are facing shortage of food and medicines, the two countries are not allowed to trade in local currencies; the United States has not released foreign exchange reserves of Afghanistan.

Prime Minister Shehbaz what have you done?

Looking at this advertisement published in a leading English newspaper of Pakistan has prompted me to communicate with my readers and or anyone who is worried about the fast deteriorating economic conditions of Pakistan.

I am ready to say without mincing my words that historically Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (UAE) have been more than gracious in extending support to Pakistan, the first Muslim country to attain the status of ‘Atomic Power’.  

At this juncture when the negotiations with the lender of last resort, International Monetary Fund (IMF) have been marred there was an urgent need for Pakistan to have enough foreign exchange reserves, be it earned or borrowed, to meet the targets agreed with the Fund.

Since commercial borrowing could prove fatal, the only option was to approach the ‘time tested friends’, who have reciprocated as usual. Therefore, it is not a ’well-done’ by the incumbent prime minister, but graciousness of the Monarchs.

It is true that Mian Sahib, has been put in a very difficult position by the coalition partners, they don’t want to take responsibility of ‘bad’ decisions but to attain political mileage in the upcoming elections.

It appears that some of Mian Sahib’s advisors, fearful of the repercussions of ‘bad’ decisions are suggesting to sweep the issues under the carpet, which can make the things even more complicated for him as well as Pakistan.

Mian Sahib has already committed ‘double fault’ by not increasing prices of energy products, despite recommendations by the Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA).

The harsh reality is that with each passing day, price of crude oil hovering at higher level and Rupee witnessing erosion in value the quantum of subsidy has already become unmanageable.

The sooner the incumbent government increases the tariffs of energy products, the better it will be for Pakistan. It may be a blessing that Pakistan’s friends are willing to supply oil/POL products at deferred payment, but the outstanding amount has to be settled in due course of time.

The other decisions which has offended overseas Pakistanis, remitting around US$2.5 billion per month, is ‘unwillingness’ of the incumbent government to allow them to cast their votes in the general elections of Pakistan.

According to informed sources, overseas Pakistanis have threatened to withdraw amounts kept in Roshan Digital Accounts, if they are not allowed to cast their vote in forthcoming general election.

To conclude, there is a friendly advice to the incumbent government that it must address the grievances of overseas Pakistanis without any further delay. While the IMF has indicated to give Pakistan US$2 billion over the next two years, overseas Pakistanis are sending more than this amount every month.