This alliance comes at a time when Israel stands accused of
genocide in Gaza and the West Bank. Global outrage is mounting, yet India has
chosen this moment to embrace Tel Aviv more openly than ever. The message is
clear: New Delhi now values military advantage and strategic visibility over
moral credibility.
Once, India’s foreign policy drew strength from its
anti-colonial roots and its historic commitment to freedom struggles. It stood
with the oppressed — from African liberation movements to the Palestinian
cause. That era is gone. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India’s diplomacy
has shed moral caution for ideological affinity. The new partnership formalizes
years of covert cooperation in defense, intelligence, and cyberwarfare — all
underpinned by a common political psychology.
Zionism and Hindutva, though born in different contexts,
share a majoritarian worldview: both cast national identity in religious terms,
both view minorities as internal adversaries, and both justify occupation as
self-defense. The defense treaty, therefore, is not just about weapons and
technology; it is a public endorsement of this shared ideological DNA.
Regionally, the implications are grave. Pakistan will
interpret it as an existential provocation. Bangladesh will face a diplomatic
dilemma, caught between public sympathy for Palestine and dependence on India.
South Asia’s post-colonial spirit of solidarity is eroding, replaced by an era
of militarized rivalry and ideological segregation.
Inside India, the pact sends a chilling message to nearly
200 million Muslims. For decades, India’s symbolic support for Palestine
offered reassurance of secular balance. That pretense has now vanished. The new
India appears comfortable aligning with those who mirror its own majoritarian
instincts.
In the end, the India–Israel alliance binds together two
occupiers — one subjugating a people under siege, the other suppressing dissent
at home. Power may win them weapons and allies, but it cannot cleanse the moral
stain of occupation. Nations that mistake domination for destiny often discover
that empires fall not from weakness, but from the weight of their own injustice

No comments:
Post a Comment