A high-level US delegation’s visit to Beirut, led by senior
counterterrorism officials, carried a familiar ultimatum: Lebanon’s progress
depends on disarming Hezbollah and cutting its ties with Iran. The message was
cloaked in diplomatic niceties about freedom and prosperity, but the intent was
blunt coercion. For a country still grappling with economic collapse and
political paralysis, Washington’s prescriptions sound less like support and
more like dictates.
Hezbollah has made its position unmistakably clear. Deputy
Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem declared that Israel’s aggression “cannot
persist” and that his movement “will not abandon its weapons.”
The statement, echoed across Lebanese media, was not mere
rhetoric — it was a reminder that Hezbollah remains deeply rooted in Lebanon’s
social, political, and security landscape. Any attempt to uproot it through
sanctions or external pressure will only strengthen its defiance.
Meanwhile, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun’s reassurances to
visiting American officials about tackling terrorism financing seem less a
policy commitment and more a gesture of survival under duress. Washington’s
sanctions on Hezbollah members came not as part of constructive diplomacy but
as punitive leverage — reinforcing the perception that the US seeks submission,
not partnership.
The pattern is depressingly familiar. From Iraq to Syria,
Washington’s self-assigned role as regional architect has left behind fractured
states and festering resentment. Lebanon risks becoming the next stage for this
failed experiment.
If the US truly seeks stability, it must abandon its
obsession with remolding sovereign nations to suit its strategic comfort.
Otherwise, its anti-Hezbollah campaign may end up backfiring — deepening
Lebanon’s divisions and pushing the region toward another preventable crisis.

No comments:
Post a Comment