The most surprising winner was South Africa itself. For
decades, African hosts have been expected to simply provide the stage while
major powers dominate the script. This time, Pretoria seized the pen. It pushed
Africa’s priorities—climate financing, debt restructuring, fairer market
access—onto the centre table with unusual assertiveness. South Africa didn’t
just moderate the discussion; it shaped its direction. The message was
unmistakable - Africa is no longer willing to play the audience in global
decision-making.
China emerged as another strategic winner. While Western
delegations appeared divided and preoccupied with their internal political
headaches, Beijing arrived with clarity and purpose. Its emphasis on
development partnerships and a more inclusive economic order resonated strongly
with emerging economies hungry for alternatives. China did not need to dominate
the summit; it simply positioned itself as the reliable, steady voice amid
Western hesitation.
The United States found itself on the losing side. Its
delegation carried the weight of domestic polarization, resulting in cautious,
often diluted messaging. Washington struggled to offer bold commitments—on
climate, investment, or economic cooperation. For a country accustomed to
setting the global agenda, the lack of strategic energy was hard to ignore.
Europe performed slightly better but still fell short. Its
rhetoric on rules-based order and environmental responsibility was admirable,
yet it lacked the financial muscle to persuade. Fine principles without
practical incentives seldom win followers.
In the end, the G20 meeting in South Africa did not merely
debate global problems; it exposed a shifting world. Africa is stepping
forward, China is consolidating influence, and traditional Western powers are
wrestling with diminishing authority. The polite diplomacy could not hide that
the global balance is changing—fast.

No comments:
Post a Comment