Over the last few years, we have turned debt acquisition
into a disciplined craft. China rolls over funds before we even finish the
request. Saudi Arabia extends deposits faster than we can print press releases
thanking them. And commercial banks? They happily oblige—charging interest
rates so high they should come with a health warning. But we take the money
anyway, proudly calling it “stabilization.”
Yet when it comes to boosting exports—the one activity that
could actually reduce our dependency—we become painfully sluggish. The same
state that can negotiate billions overnight cannot help exporters ship a
container on time. Infrastructure collapses, policies flip, energy costs
skyrocket, and bureaucratic hurdles stretch on longer than IMF
conditionalities.
Our export basket still resembles a museum catalogue:
textiles, some rice, a bit of leather, and heroic claims that IT exports will
one day rescue us. Meanwhile, competitors raced ahead years ago. Bangladesh
became a garment giant, Vietnam turned into a global manufacturing hub, and
India climbed the tech value chain. Pakistan? We perfected the art of writing
desperate letters requesting “emergency support.”
We do not lack vision—only execution. We produce policies
like an assembly line but refuse to implement even the simplest reforms.
Instead, we remain obsessed with “new inflows,” as if the nation is a
smartphone constantly running on low battery and eternally plugged into someone
else’s charger.
It is the grand irony of our economic life: we can sell our
pleas faster than we can sell our products. Friendly countries trust us with
their money more than global markets trust our goods.
Until Pakistan learns to earn instead of borrow, we will
remain trapped in this cycle—experts at seeking debt, amateurs at creating
value.

No comments:
Post a Comment