From Seven Sisters to Magnificent Seven: Is America’s Supremacy Changing?

The emergence of United States as the world’s economic superpower was closely intertwined with oil. For much of the 20th century, the global petroleum industry was dominated by the “Seven Sisters”—five American companies and two European majors. Their influence extended far beyond their home countries. They controlled substantial portions of exploration, production, transportation, refining and marketing, particularly in the Middle East.

Oil was therefore much more than a commodity. Control over its production and supply gave the West enormous economic and geopolitical leverage—and helped underpin American supremacy, but the source of power is changing.

In 2026, the United States still possesses unparalleled military capabilities. Yet its confrontation with Iran has highlighted a new reality - military superiority does not automatically translate into absolute strategic dominance. Iran’s ability to employ relatively inexpensive missiles and drones demonstrates how cost asymmetry can challenge even the most sophisticated and expensive military systems.

Meanwhile, another group of seven American companies has emerged as symbols of a new economic era - Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Tesla—the “Magnificent Seven.”

Their power is fundamentally different from that of the Seven Sisters. These entities dominate artificial intelligence, semiconductors, software, cloud computing, data, digital platforms and other technologies that increasingly determine economic competitiveness, yet there is an important contradiction.

While Wall Street provides these corporations with enormous access to capital and valuation, their physical production and supply chains are global. Critical components, manufacturing capacity and rare-earth processing remain heavily dependent on other countries. A country can therefore lead the technological revolution while remaining dependent on foreign ecosystems for some of its physical foundations.

This raises a serious question, is America moving from an age of controlling the world’s most important commodity to an age of controlling its most important technologies—without necessarily controlling everything those technologies require?

The United States may remain the world’s most powerful nation. But perhaps the era of absolute American supremacy is giving way to an era of shared supremacy, in which China, Japan and other major powers increasingly possess the resources, manufacturing capabilities and technologies needed to shape the global order.

The Seven Sisters built an oil-powered America. The Magnificent Seven may be building a technology-powered America, but unlike oil, technology cannot be controlled in isolation.

Trump Sinking Deeper into the Marsh

Donald Trump may have entered the war against Iran believing that overwhelming American and Israeli military power would deliver a quick and decisive victory. Instead, he appears to be sinking deeper into a strategic marsh. The more he struggles to secure the outcome he expected, the more complicated the consequences seem to become.

The first problem is that Trump joined Israel in a war against Iran without a sufficiently broad coalition of trusted American allies. What may have been conceived as an assertion of American power has increasingly exposed the limitations of unilateral action. Iran has suffered enormous damage, but it has also demonstrated a resilience that appears to have exceeded Washington’s expectations.

The second—and perhaps more serious—problem is Trump’s mindset. He appears reluctant to consider that his original assumptions may have been wrong. If Iran cannot be forced into submission, continuing the war carries mounting costs; yet accepting this reality could require Trump to acknowledge a strategic miscalculation.

The regional consequences are equally troubling. Arab governments may increasingly perceive that, when American and Arab interests diverge, Israel remains Washington’s first choice for protection. The confrontation around the Strait of Hormuz adds another layer of resentment. Gulf economies depend heavily on uninterrupted crude exports, and restrictions on shipping threaten their interests even when they are not parties to the conflict.

Meanwhile, Iran is not isolated. Israel’s claim that China is providing technical expertise to Tehran points to an increasingly important dimension of the conflict - America may be pushing Iran closer to a powerful strategic partner.

The consequences are spreading beyond the Middle East. The withdrawal of American aircraft carriers from the South China Sea has weakened Washington’s immediate naval posture in an area where China is the principal challenger.

At the same time, depleted US arsenals, after years of support for Ukraine and the demands of the Iran conflict, could constrain Washington’s ability to respond elsewhere.

Then comes oil. Despite the disruption surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, crude prices have not reached the dramatic US$200-per-barrel level that would have transformed the economic equation in America’s favor.

Trump therefore faces an increasingly difficult choice: continue the war and risk sinking deeper, or seek an exit that could be portrayed as retreat.

The marsh may no longer be Iran. It may be Trump’s own conviction that admitting a mistake is more dangerous than continuing to struggle.

PSX average daily trading volume declines by 26%WoW

Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) remained subdued during this past week, with the escalation of the US-Iran conflict, now in its seventh month, being the primary headwind, following US strikes on Iran and subsequent Iranian retaliatory strikes on US air bases in the region. Market activity also weakened, with average daily trading volume declining by 26%WoW to 971 million shares.

Consequently, Brent crude surged to a six-week high of US$97.6/ bbl during the week, while the benchmark Index declined 2,368 points, down 1.3%WoW to close at 175,329.

However, negative sentiments were partially offset by Pakistan’s record US$3 billion dual-tranche Eurobond issuance, which achieved the lowest spreads over US Treasuries in two decades and marked the country’s largest-ever international capital market transaction.

Trade deficit widened 10%YoY to US$3.2 billion in August 2026, although it narrowed 20%MoM despite higher international oil prices.

CPI for August 2026 accelerated to 11.1%YoY (9.2%YoY in June 2026) on higher Transport and Food prices.

FBR surpassed its 2MFY27 revenue target by PKR12 billion, while the government raised PKR657 billion through T-Bill auctions, with yields ranging between 11.39% and 11.99% across tenors.

Cement dispatches edged down 0.7%YoY to 4.0 million tons amid monsoon rains, while petroleum offtakes declined 3%YoY to 1.3 million tons due to transporters strikes.

Other major news flow during the week included: 1) Pakistan to head joint defence secretariat under Makkah Defence Alliance, 2) GoP made record PKR1.2 trillion early repayment of central bank debt, 3) IMF cites Pakistan as model for debt, growth and reform drive, 4) Cotton arrivals rose 27%YoY to 1.7 million bales in August 2026, and 5) foreign exchange reserves held by SBP rose modestly to US$17.1 billion as of August 28, 2026.

Top performing sectors were Textile Composites and Refineries, while the laggards included Banks, Pharmaceuticals, and Technology.

Major selling was recorded by Mutual Funds (US$18.1 million) and Foreigners (US$7.4 million). Net buyers were Individuals with US$16.6 million.

Top performing scrips were: PGLC, THALL, EFERT, TPLRF1, and ILP, while laggards included: PSEL, SCBPL, SRVI, KOHC, and BAHL.

AKD Securities expects the market to improve on the back of strengthening economic indicators and a strong fiscal position, while moderating inflation should increase the likelihood of interest rates returning to single digits by year-end.

Additionally, a potential US Iran deal could moderate international oil prices towards pre-conflict levels. Market continues to trade at attractive valuations.

Top picks of the brokerage house include: OGDC, PPL, UBL, MEBL, HBL, FFC, ENGROH, PSO, LUCK, FCCL, INDU, ILP and SYS.

USS Abraham Lincoln: A Metaphor for a Depleted America

The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln in Thailand should prompt more than curiosity about the rusty appearance of an American supercarrier. It offers a striking metaphor for the condition of the United States itself.

The almost 1,100-foot-long carrier arrived at Laem Chabang after an extraordinary 286 days without a full rest-and-relaxation port call. Much of that period was reportedly spent conducting grueling combat operations against Iran. Its heavily rusted hull tells the story of prolonged deployment, while reports of supply shortages and morale problems raise questions about the condition of its crew.

To be fair, rust on a warship after prolonged deployment is not unusual. Naval experts say removing it requires substantial maintenance that cannot easily be undertaken during combat operations. The issue, therefore, is not simply the rust. It is the prolonged deployment that produced it.

That distinction carries a much larger message.

The United States appears to be confronting a similar problem - too many commitments, enormous financial burdens and insufficient time to replenish the resources consumed by sustained military operations.

Federal debt has climbed to around US$40 trillion, while prolonged conflicts and military commitments have placed extraordinary demands on defense resources. Concerns about ammunition stocks and replenishment have further exposed the limits of maintaining high-intensity operations indefinitely.

But the deeper problem is strategic rather than physical or financial. The real test of a superpower is not how much it can spend or how many weapons it possesses, but whether it can translate overwhelming capabilities into clearly defined and achievable political objectives.

This is where the contrast with Donald Trump's promise of “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) becomes uncomfortable.

Greatness cannot be measured merely by bigger ships, larger defense budgets or louder rhetoric. It requires a resilient economy, sustainable military power, sound strategy and the ability to achieve stated objectives without exhausting the resources needed for tomorrow.

The USS Abraham Lincoln may simply need maintenance after an unusually long deployment. But as a metaphor, it raises a more consequential question, is America replenishing its power—or exhausting it?

MAGA promised to make America great again. The rust on the Lincoln suggests that, before greatness can be restored, America may first need to repair, replenish and rethink the way it exercises its power.

 

Trump Has Weakened the United States

Make America Great Again (MAGA) was sold to Americans as a promise to restore the United States to a golden age—greater economic vitality, stronger sovereignty and renewed global influence. But as Donald Trump's second term approaches its midpoint, the record increasingly suggests the opposite - America may be becoming more powerful in rhetoric, but weaker in substance.

Trump is undoubtedly one of the most consequential presidents in modern American history. The problem is that many of the consequences of his policies have been damaging not only to American society but also to the country's relative power and standing in the world.

America's greatest strength has never rested solely on its military or economic might. It has also depended on the credibility of its commitments. Allies cooperate with Washington because they believe its promises will endure beyond the next political cycle. Trump's repeated threats against NATO, public attacks on allies and abrupt shifts in foreign policy have weakened that confidence while creating opportunities for adversaries.

His transactional approach to diplomacy has produced another cost, unpredictability. Tariff threats, sudden policy reversals and pressure on partners have made it increasingly difficult for governments to know where Washington will stand tomorrow. Trade wars have also imposed costs on American consumers, farmers and manufacturers while inviting retaliation.

At home, the damage is equally consequential. Persistent attacks on the judiciary, media, intelligence agencies and electoral institutions have deepened political polarization and eroded public trust. A democracy that increasingly doubts its own institutions cannot project the same confidence abroad.

The consequences extend to America's fiscal position and long-term resilience. Large deficits, rising debt, weakened climate preparedness and politicization of national-security decisions constrain the country's ability to respond effectively to future crises.

MAGA promised to make America great again. Yet greatness is not measured by how loudly a nation asserts its power, but by how effectively it converts economic strength, democratic institutions, alliances and international trust into lasting influence.

Trump may have strengthened the politics of grievance, but he has weakened the foundations of American power. In seeking to put America first, he risks leaving the United States more divided at home, less trusted abroad and, ultimately, weaker.

Sinokor VLCC abandoned

The crew of the VLCC Senegal Prosperity have been evacuated leaving the tanker abandoned and listing in the Strait of Hormuz. The Liberian-registered 320,780 dwt Senegal Prosperity was struck three times by what were described in security reports as “rockets” while transiting the Strait of Hormuz. The tanker was struck on its port side, engine room, and ballast tank.

According to an update from the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) the Senegal Prosperity was southbound exiting the Strait to the Gulf of Oman and was 4 nm from the Oman coast at the time of the incident on 22:00hrs UTC on 30 August.

JMIC said the Company Security Officer (CSO) reported that all communications were lost with the vessel following the attack and it was dead in the water and listing to port.

The VLCC dropped anchor at position 2619N 05633E. The crew of the vessels were evacuated by the local authorities leaving it abandoned in the Strait of Hormuz off the Omani coast. There no casualties among the crew.

The tanker's last broadcast AIS position was two days ago offshore from Ju Aymah Oil Terminal in Saudi Arabia, in a laden condition on 28 August, according to data from Pole Star Global.

Meanwhile US forces undertook further strikes on 1 September on Iranian military targets bordering the Strait.

“US forces struck Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets including air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets and facilities, mine laying capabilities, and communications sites,” US Central Command said.

“The strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members.”

Courtesy: Seatrade Maritime News

 

Egypt–China: Is China Rewriting the Strategic Equation?

For decades, Egypt has been regarded as one of Washington’s most important partners in the Middle East. It was the first Arab state to establish diplomatic relations with Israel following the Camp David Accords and has remained a major recipient of US military assistance. Yet the strategic landscape appears to be changing.

The ongoing US-Iran war has forced countries across the Middle East to reassess their security and economic relationships. Against this backdrop, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s return to Egypt after a decade is more than a ceremonial visit. It comes as Beijing and Cairo celebrate 70 years of diplomatic relations and deepen cooperation in trade, investment, defence and technology.

The question, therefore, is not simply whether Egypt is moving away from Washington. Is China gradually rewriting Egypt’s strategic equation—and using Cairo as a gateway to a broader Middle Eastern and African presence?

Egypt occupies a unique geopolitical position. It connects the Arab world with Africa, the Mediterranean and the Red Sea, while the Suez Canal remains a critical artery of global commerce. Chinese investment around the canal has transformed this geography into a major industrial opportunity.

The relationship is also extending beyond economics. Joint military exercises and expanding defence cooperation indicate that Cairo is diversifying its strategic partnerships. At the same time, China’s growing engagement with Egypt reflects Beijing’s preference for influence through investment, infrastructure, technology and diplomacy rather than a conventional military footprint.

This does not necessarily mean Egypt is choosing China over America. Cairo may simply be seeking greater strategic autonomy at a time when regional countries are increasingly reluctant to depend exclusively on any single power, that may be the more significant development.

For decades, the Middle East operated largely within an American-led strategic framework. Today, China is emerging as an economic, diplomatic and technological alternative, while regional states appear increasingly comfortable cultivating relationships with multiple powers.

Perhaps, therefore, the real story is not Egypt moving from Washington to Beijing. It is the Middle East moving towards a new strategic equilibrium.

If so, the US-Iran war may ultimately be remembered not merely as another regional conflict, but as a catalyst that accelerated the transition from an old paradigm to a new one.