In a rare move, the US State Department called Israeli envoy
Mike Herzog in to voice its displeasure at the Knesset vote the night
before repealing the 2005 Disengagement Law in northern Samaria.
According
to a brief readout of that meeting, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman
conveyed Washington’s concern over the move, including the prohibition on establishing
settlements in the northern West Bank. They also discussed the importance of
all parties refraining from actions or rhetoric that could further inflame
tensions leading into the Ramadan, Passover and Easter holidays.
There was no word regarding how Herzog responded, and
neither the Foreign Ministry nor the Prime Minister’s Office statement. What
Herzog could have reminded Sherman, but probably did not, is that this was a
decision made by the democratically elected government of Israel and passed
democratically by its parliament.
Why stress that point? Because the Americans over the last
several weeks have expressed concern about the judicial overhaul proposal and
the democratic direction of the country. Herzog could have said, “You want
democracy? Well, this is democracy.”
Yet, not every decision made democratically is wise, nor the
timing particularly opportune. And this is one of those cases.
Not for nothing did Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu block
this type of bill from passing the Knesset in the past.
In March 2019, before the first of a cycle of five
elections, then-justice minister Ayelet Shaked said that Netanyahu
had blocked the cancellation of the Disengagement Law for political reasons,
and that her New Right Party would work for the law’s repeal in the next
coalition. The prime minister reportedly kept the bill from progressing on
numerous occasions from 2015–2019 because he understood its sensitivity,
including the impact in could have on his relations with Washington.
It’s a shame that Netanyahu, circa 2023, did not listen to
Netanyahu, circa 2015-2019.
Had he done so, it could have spared Israel a reprimand from
the US State Department which characterized the law as “provocative and
counterproductive,” saying that it contradicted prior commitments given to
America 20 years ago by then-prime minister Ariel Sharon, and just a few days
ago by the current government.
While Israel can withstand US disapproval of one policy or
another, when the disagreements come in quick succession there is a concern
about accumulative impact.
The
Knesset Disengagement Law comes hot on the heels of Finance Minister Bezalel
Smotrich’s utterance that there is “no such thing as a Palestinian people.” And
that followed his comment that Huwara should be erased. Both remarks were
condemned by the US.
This is in addition to America’s stated concern about the
judicial reform bill. President Joe Biden, who has pointedly not yet invited
Netanyahu to the White House for a meeting, spoke with the prime minister by
phone this week and, according to a US readout of that conversation,
“underscore[d] his belief that democratic values have always been, and must
remain, a hallmark of the US-Israel relationship, that democratic societies are
strengthened by genuine checks and balances, and that fundamental changes
should be pursued with the broadest possible base of popular support.”
The
aggregate of all this is negative, and is coming at a time when Iran continues
moving closer to the nuclear finish line and Israel will need US assistance –
diplomatic or otherwise – to prevent it from crossing that line and gaining
nuclear capabilities.
It is also coming as some in the Democratic Party, and not
only the usual suspects of far-Left progressives, are speaking of the need to
curtail aid to Israel.
For instance, Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy said on Sunday
that Washington should condition its aid to Israel. “I think the United States
needs to draw a harder line with this government,” he said in a CNN interview.
“If
we’re going to continue to be in the business of supporting the Israeli
government, they have to be in the continued business of a future Palestinian
state.”
Even if the prime minister disagrees with these sentiments,
the Netanyahu of past governments would have been attuned to them and adjusted
policy accordingly.
The
current Netanyahu, however, is not similarly attuned, and the result – as the
summons of Herzog to the State Department attests – is bad for Israel-US ties.
Courtesy: The Jerusalem Post