According to an AP report, Biden administration officials
are insisting that the election of a hard-liner as Iran’s president won’t
affect reviving the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran. But, there are signs that
prospects of concluding a deal are getting bleaker.
Optimism that a deal was imminent faded as the talks ended on
Sunday without tangible indications of significant progress. On Monday, in his
first public comments since the vote, incoming Iranian President Ebrahim
Raisi rejected a key Biden goal of expanding on the nuclear deal if
negotiators are able to salvage the old one.
Raisi is likely to raise the Iran’s demands for sanctions
relief in return for Iranian compliance with the deal, as he himself is already
subject to US human rights penalties.
“I don’t envy the Biden team,” said Karim Sadjapour, a
senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who has advised
multiple US administrations on Iran. “I think the administration now has a
heightened sense of urgency to revise the deal before Raisi and a new hard-line
team is inaugurated.”
President Joe Biden and his team have made the US return to
the deal one of their top foreign policy priorities. The deal was one of
President Barack Obama’s signature achievements; one that aides now serving in
the Biden administration had helped negotiate and that Donald
Trump repudiated and tried to dismantle as president.
Despite Raisi’s impending presidency, Biden administration
officials insist prospects for reaching an agreement are unaltered. They argue
that Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who signed off the 2015 deal
known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), will make the final
decision, regardless of who is president.
“The president’s view and our view is that the decision
leader is the supreme leader,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said
Monday. “That was the case before the election; it’s the case today; it will be
the case probably moving forward.”
“Iran will have, we expect, the same supreme leader in
August as it will have today, as it had before the elections, as it had in 2015
when the JCPOA was consummated for the first time,” State Department spokesman
Ned Price said.
But hopes for substantial progress fizzled last week ahead
of the Iranian election amid a flurry of speculation about the impact of the
vote on the indirect talks between Iran and the US in Vienna. Diplomats and
others familiar with the talks had thought the last round, the sixth, could
produce at least a tangible result even if it fell short of a full deal.
Now, that round has ended and a seventh round has yet to be
scheduled as Raisi, Iran’s conservative judiciary chief, brandished an absolute
rejection of anything more than Iran’s bare minimum compliance with the 2015
agreement in exchange for a lifting all of US sanctions.
In his public comments Monday, Raisi brushed aside US calls
for Iran to agree to follow-on discussions on expanding the initial nuclear
deal to include its ballistic missile program and its support for regional
groups that the US designates terrorist organizations.
“It’s nonnegotiable,” Raisi said’
Iran experts agree it will be a tough, if not impossible,
for Biden to get Iran to go beyond the nuclear agreement.
“I’m very skeptical that once we’ve lifted the sanctions to
get them to return they’ll feel any incentive to come back and negotiate more
concessions,” Sadjapour said. “And, if we coerce them with sanctions to come
back to the table, they’ll argue that we’ve abrogated our end of the nuclear
deal again.”
Critics of the nuclear deal maintain that the administration
has already given away too much in exchange for too little by signaling its
desire to repudiate Trump’s repudiation of the nuclear deal. And, they say that
even if Iran agrees to some sort of additional talks, the pledge will be
meaningless.
“It was pretty obvious that the Iranians were never going to
negotiate in good faith beyond the JCPOA,” said Rich Goldberg, a Trump
administration National Security Council official who has espoused a hard line
on Iran.
“But now, even if the administration gets some sort of
face-saving language from the Iranians about future talks, Raisi has already
said they’re not interested. The jig is up,” he said. “You can’t come back to a
skeptical Congress, allies and deal opponents and say the promise means
anything it means when Raisi has already said it doesn’t.”
But administration officials are adamant that as good as the
nuclear deal is, it is insufficient and must be improved on.
“We do see a return to compliance as necessary but
insufficient, but we also do see a return to compliance as enabling us to take
on those other issues diplomatically,” Price said, adding that the point had
been made clear to the Iranians “in no uncertain terms.”
An additional complication is that Raisi will become the
first serving Iranian president sanctioned by the US government even before
entering office, in part over his time as the head of Iran’s internationally
criticized judiciary — a situation that could complicate state visits and
speeches at international forums such as the United Nations.
Psaki and Price both said that the US will continue to hold
Raisi accountable for human rights violations for which he was sanctioned by
the Trump administration.
Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018 and set about a
“maximum pressure” campaign on Iran that included re-instating all the
sanctions eased under the agreement along with adding a host of new ones.