Such comments reflect the stance of a ruling party that is
the closest thing Putin has to a major ally. The war should stop but the United
States is to blame.
President Xi Jinping’s government has tried to distance
itself from Russia’s offensive but avoided criticizing Moscow. The government
has offered to act as mediator and denounced trade and financial sanctions
against Russia.
Ruling party control of all Chinese media and intensive
internet censorship make it hard to gauge public opinion. But what the party
allows online and requires media to publish make clear what it wants the public
to think.
Media outlets were told last week to post only pro-Russian
content and to censor anti-Russian or pro-Western views, according to a copy of
instructions posted on the social media account of the newspaper Beijing News.
The post was later deleted.
Online and in social media, expressions of sympathy for
Ukraine and support for Russia appear but not criticism of Moscow.
“When a war begins, is it not the children of ordinary people
who serve as cannon fodder”, said a post signed Da Ke Ming Yi on the Weibo
social media platform. “Those who died were the children of ordinary people.”
A letter signed by five professors from prominent
universities that criticized Russia for attacking a weaker neighbor appeared
briefly on social media before being deleted.
“We stand against unjust wars,” said the academics from
schools including Tsinghua University in Beijing, alma mater of many ruling
party leaders.
Comments posted by nationalists criticized the professors
for failing to stick to the ruling party’s official position of neutrality.
The ruling party has spent decades using school textbooks
and the entirely state-controlled media to nurture a sense of nationalist
grievance. It accuses the United States of trying to block China’s rise to its
rightful position of global leadership.
State media repeat Beijing’s position that the United States
and its European allies are to blame for the Ukraine war because they failed to
respond to Russian concerns that its democratic neighbor should be barred from
joining NATO, the Western military alliance.
That echoes Chinese complaints that Washington and its
allies are interfering in its domestic affairs and issues of national
sovereignty, including its claim over Taiwan, territorial disputes in the South
China Sea, and in Xinjiang, the far-western region where China has been accused
of detaining over a million Uyghurs.
Russia’s attack, as a historical event, “is not a good one,”
but “people think the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is because the United
States stirred up trouble,” said Zheng Bowen, a 38-year old engineer.
The state-run newspaper Capital News exhorted the public to
line up with the ruling party: “The nation’s attitude is our attitude.”
“China has always upheld a fair and responsible attitude,
calling on all parties to exercise restraint and ease the situation, and return
to dialogue and negotiation,” it said.
However, the newspaper appeared to support Putin’s demand
that Ukraine become a neutral buffer between Russia and Europe and give up the
possibility of NATO membership.
“Ultimately, Ukraine should be a bridge between East and
West, rather than a frontier of confrontation between major powers,” the
Capital News said.
Comments online have called for China to support Russia by
purchasing its exports of oil, gas and other goods.
“Let the Russian Embassy sell their goods on livestream.
Let’s show them China’s buying power,” said a comment signed Bao Zou Guang Xiao
Pang on Weibo. It received 42,000 likes.
A separate comment advocating that China maintain normal
trade with Russia, an implicit rejection of sanctions, received nearly 80,000
likes.
Social media platforms have urged users to act responsibly
and say they have removed thousands of postings about the attack on Ukraine.
Douyin, a short-video service operated by the Chinese owner
of TikTok, said it deleted more than 3,500 videos and 12,100 comments due to
“vulgar, war belittling, sensationalist and unfriendly comments.”
The popular WeChat message service also complained about
“vulgar posts” that it said have a “negative impact on cyberspace.”
It said some users “took the opportunity to publish bad
information about international current affairs,” including comments belittling
the war such as crass jokes about “gaining course credits by going to Ukraine
and fighting in the war” and asking “Ukrainian beauties to come to China,” the
platform said.
WeChat’s post was later shared by a unit of China’s internet
watchdog, the Cyberspace Administration of China.
Weibo said it removed more than 4,000 posts that were vulgar
and ridiculed war. It said more than 10,000 accounts were closed.
“Peaceful environments do not come easily,” the company said
in a social media post. It called on users to “maintain an objective and
rational attitude” and take part in discussion “in a reasonable manner.”
No comments:
Post a Comment