The West, with the United States in particular, has been
shipping billions of dollars worth weapons to Ukraine. As the Ukraine war drags
on, more sophisticated weapons are being delivered in an attempt to prolong the
war. At the same time, Western governments have been very wary of direct
involvement in confronting Russia on the battlefield.
The most that the West has done is impose round after round
of sanctions on Moscow. However, despite repeated Ukrainian appeals, the
European Union says there are no rigid timelines for Kyiv to become a
member. "There are no rigid timelines, but there are goals that you
have to reach," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said
during an EU-Ukraine summit in Kyiv attended by 15 of the 27-nation bloc's
commissioners.
"Ukraine and the EU, we are family," European
Council President Charles Michel claimed. "The future of Ukraine is
within the European Union," he chipped in, while also refusing to comment
about any timeline. The EU has declined to offer a fast-track membership, with
the bloc's officials citing several entry requirements such as political
and economic stability.
The EU
is saying we have goals but we don't have timelines. If we look at that in a
wider context and the promises the EU gave to Turkey about its accession which
Ankara has not seen for decades now, this process could take many years,
potentially a decade judging by Croatia?, the last country that gained
membership. It's a similar approach that the US-led NATO military alliance has
taken toward Kyiv.
This effectively means there is no real intention on the EU
or NATO side apart from keeping Ukrainians to continue fighting, dying, and
suffering as well as prolonging the war to serve the purposes of US
hegemony.
Weapons
have been pouring into Ukraine with one NATO member trying to outbid the others
in sending its most advanced military equipment. The Western
military-industrial complex has been making extremely lucrative profits in the
process.
Prolonging the war, Ukrainian blood as well as rising
inflation rate in Europe with consumers struggling to survive as a
result.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also used the summit
to call on his Western allies to send even more sophisticated weapons to help
repel Russian forces in the country's east.
This is the same region in the country that has witnessed
deadly fighting between ethnic Russians and Ukrainian forces since 2014, killing
at least 14,000 people until Russia launched what it called a "special
military operation".
But can these more advanced weapons help Ukrainian forces?
More recently that has come under the spotlight, with NATO members themselves
divided on the issue. Some NATO members have started to question whether
supporting Ukraine is going ahead as it had planned.
Reports have emerged that say the tanks being sent to
Ukraine will take months to arrive at the frontline, perhaps until the end of
May this year. This is while Russia has been taking large chunks of the Eastern
Donbas region.
There is also an expectation among experts that Russia will
launch a massive operation in the coming weeks or months, should the war
continue, and consolidate its forces in the towns and villages there. That is
expected to happen before any NATO tanks even reach the frontline in the
country's east.
Russia
can mobilize a large number of soldiers and military equipment. That is why
NATO at some point will have to enter peace negotiations with Russia. But the
pro-war camp led by the hawks in Washington and others in Europe have been
advocating for more escalation.
This comes even though it is the Ukrainians who are
suffering the most.
The European Commission president has since taken down a
video that revealed Ukraine has lost 100,000 soldiers in ten months. Some
say that is a conservative figure when you factor in all the soldiers that are
missing and whose mothers and wives are desperately searching for them.
Even the 100,000 figure is horrifyingly large. Some
pundits following the war closely have suggested the actual death toll among
the Ukrainian armed forces is around a quarter of a million.
Most Western media reporters are stationed in western
Ukraine. Research by other journalists who have been dispatched to the
flashpoint eastern part of the country on the frontline where the fighting is
taking place shows these are realistic figures.
A few months ago, Moscow said it had lost 6,000 of its
servicemen. That death toll could be higher but analysts say it will never come
anywhere close to the Ukrainian fatalities, who are dying in much higher
numbers.
This is not taking into account the pro-Russian forces in
the Donbas as well as private military fighters, but without doubt, the Russians
have overwhelmingly artillery superiority.
Many journalists believe the figures on the Ukrainian side
of 100,000 are far more accurate.
What the U.S. wants is to keep Ukrainians fighting Russia
until the last Ukrainian. It doesn't make any sense for Ukraine to continue
this war but the West is egging it on with repeated military aid packages and
false promises of accession to NATO and the EU.
Western media has also played a major role in trying to
shape public opinion.With every war, there is a level of propaganda and Ukraine
is no exception.
Noam
Chomsky, and John Pilger among a few other veteran war reporters who covered
Vietnam say they have never seen such levels of Western mainstream propaganda
when it comes to the Ukraine conflict.
With all Western reporters in the west of the country, there
is little coverage of the deaths and terror in the flashpoint east.
Most civilians in the eastern Donbas part of Ukraine voted
in a referendum to be a part of Russia.
So a
peace solution that can be found without pouring in so many weapons, but the US
and some of its Western allies are not satisfied with that scenario and want to
prolong this conflict as long as possible.
Even
before the war erupted, US officials said they wanted to use Ukraine to inflict
a geopolitical defeat on Russia.
Does it come as a surprise that before the US and NATO
refused to entertain the Kremlin's proposal for security guarantees over NATO's
expansion toward Russian borders that US and UK officials invested shares in
their respective country's arms manufacturing companies?
In essence,
this war benefits the US establishment. Unfortunately, Ukraine is being used as
yet another US proxy that is suffering from Washington's foreign military
adventurism.
This appears to be the new strategy of the US following the
death of its soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Let
other countries suffer, its civilians suffer and its soldiers die instead of
American soldiers, while at the same time serving multiple US foreign
interests. As for the EU in this current day and age, it seems to be taking its
orders directly from Washington.