As reported by The Jerusalem Post, Americans have realized
that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is incapacitated because of the political
situation he is in. Netanyahu has even gone as far as to conceal his transition
to Stage 3 of the war not only from his own war cabinet, but also from the
general public.
Netanyahu’s political predicament is already straining
the Biden administration’s patience, with a growing sense that they are
providing considerable support without receiving anything from him in return.
While the Americans are compelled to take Netanyahu’s political
affairs under consideration, he, in turn, is unwilling to extend the same
goodwill gesture toward the Democratic candidate currently residing in the
White House, who is facing a challenging and tumultuous reelection campaign.
There is a reason why John Kirby, the US’s National Security
Council spokesperson, stated this week that Israel has already shifted to a
low-intensity conflict in the North and is expected to undergo a similar
transformation in regard to the South.
This completely contradicts Netanyahu’s assertion the
previous day, in which he claimed that warfare has intensified in the southern
region of the Gaza Strip.
The Americans are exposing Netanyahu’s bluff, despite his
attempts to keep the Israeli public in partial darkness concerning the way this
war is being conducted.
The butterfly effect of the intensifying voices of unease
emanating from Washington is creating ripples that are impacting Jerusalem’s
political landscape.
Even at this stage of the war, marked by slow progress and
by military achievements that are not apparent to an untrained eye, there is
room for freedom of thought in terms of the political possibilities that could
follow.
Gantz
knew what he was getting into. He was called naïve at first, but this is a man
who was already stung once before by the political scorpion that is Benjamin
Netanyahu, when Gantz joined the Covid unity government.
He came into this current government with eyes wide open,
hopeful that after October 07, 2023 something might have changed in Israel’s
most seasoned politician.
It had, but that did not last long. Presently, many in the
political sphere believe that Gantz is devising his exit strategy. When will he
leave?
To answer that question, one must understand the power
dynamics within the government, specifically within the war cabinet.
Gantz
and Gadi Eisenkot, a minister without a portfolio, joined the emergency
government to embody the well-worn political slogan of ‘pulling their weight,’
contributing their share, and actively participating in the war effort.
Both entered the military arena, securing two of the five
seats in the national emergency unity government’s war cabinet, and have
emerged as two of the most pivotal players in the war’s management.
However,
having 100 day lapsed since they joined, it seems that their influence on the
war’s management is diminishing.
There are several examples of this, the most prominent of
which revolves around the hostages’ release. It has been more than 50 days
since the last hostage was set free, and it seems like Israel is limping along,
with little sparks of hope for the 136 hostages who are still being held
captive in Gaza in tunnels and secret locations, rising, then falling.
Every few weeks, Hamas releases additional sadistic videos
which often disclose the tragic news that a few more hostages have been
murdered.
Eisenkot
believes that it is time to stop and consider where the war machine needs to be
led next, and whether the victories Israel has achieved so far have reached a
point that justifies considering a ceasefire in exchange for the release of the
hostages.
He has argued that at the very least, this option should be
explored.
“We need to stop lying to ourselves,” Eisenkot states. “We
must be courageous and aim for an acceptable deal that will bring all of the
hostages’ home. Time is running out, and each passing day is putting their
lives in further jeopardy. We cannot stick blindly to the same strategy while
the hostages are still in captivity. Now is the critical stage in which bold
decisions must be made. Otherwise, we may as well throw in the towel.”
Up until now, Eisenkot has been perceived as a somewhat
unremarkable politician, not drawing much attention due to his perceived
neutrality and lack of charisma.
In recent weeks, he has been gaining prominence, as he
articulates opinions that resonate with public sentiment.
If a popularity poll were to be conducted now, Eisenkot, who
recently buried his son who was killed in Gaza, would garner high approval
ratings.
Eisenkot and Gantz are up against Defense Minister Yoav
Gallant and Netanyahu, who believe that exerting military force is the key to
overcoming Hamas and securing the release of hostages, echoing the strategy
that preceded the previous hostage release.
Yet, 50 days have passed without significant progress. This
issue could turn into an Archimedean point that could force Gantz and Eisenkot
to withdraw from the government.
Meanwhile, both feel that they still hold sway over
decisions, and as long as IDF soldiers are still fighting in Gaza, the war must
go on.
Furthermore, stepping down at this juncture carries
significant political risks, since such a decision could be interpreted as
Gantz and Eisenkot escaping responsibility, which could critically damage the
number of seats the currently popular National Unity party could secure in the
future.
Netanyahu is acutely aware of these considerations, and has
been actively working to exert control. As has been depicted in the past,
Netanyahu is the type of politician who never stops planning for the day after.
That is, their day after.
To achieve this, he has been focusing on strengthening his
coalition, as what is acceptable during normal times, is not so during wartime,
since the prime minister has found little room to make a move in the cabinet.
While war cabinet meetings have been scheduled to address
what the day after the war will look like for Israel, a comprehensive
discussion on this matter has yet to take place.
In fact, senior IDF officials have remarked that if the
government does not take a stance soon, the IDF will be forced to return to
areas that it had already conquered, then relinquished.