Araghchi said in a post on X that Al-Busaidi made a “short
visit” to Tehran to convey “elements of a US proposal,” adding that Iran would
deliver an “appropriate response” consistent with its principles, national
interests, and the rights of its people.
The proposal follows the fifth round of indirect talks
between Washington and Tehran, held on May 23 in Rome under Oman’s mediation.
Araghchi described that round as “one of the most
professional,” highlighting that Iran had clearly expressed its positions
during the discussions.
According to Araghchi, both sides exchanged views in Rome,
and Oman presented its proposals, which were taken back to Washington and
Tehran for review.
No date has been set for a sixth round of negotiations amid
sharp divisions over Iran’s uranium enrichment program.
On Friday, The Wall Street Journal quoted unnamed US
officials as saying the Trump administration plans to present Iran with a
formal proposal — described as a “term sheet” — demanding a halt to uranium
enrichment as a precondition for a potential agreement.
One senior official reportedly warned, “If they don’t accept
these terms, it’s not going to be a good day for the Iranians.”
Analysts believe the US proposal is designed to address
Israeli security concerns, as Israel remains strongly opposed to any Iranian
nuclear capability.
Meanwhile, earlier on Saturday, Iran dismissed a new report
from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that claimed Tehran has
doubled its stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity.
The IAEA estimated Iran now holds 408.6 kilograms—an amount
potentially sufficient for nine nuclear weapons if further enriched.
Iran labeled the report “baseless” and accused the agency of
engaging in political maneuvering.
The IAEA’s findings have heightened international concern, as tensions escalate
across the region.
Israeli media have reported that Tel Aviv is preparing for
potential strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
However, US President Donald Trump has reportedly urged
Israel to refrain from any military action, fearing a broader regional conflict.
