According to NBC News, Netanyahu plans to argue that Iran’s
expanding ballistic missile program presents an urgent threat requiring swift
action. He is expected to present Trump with options for US involvement in
potential military operations. Analysts, however, view this shift in emphasis
with skepticism. Sina Toossi of the Center for International Policy notes that
Netanyahu’s focus on missiles appears to be an attempt to manufacture a new
casus belli after the collapse of the nuclear argument.
This
inconsistency has drawn criticism even within Israel. Yair Golan, leader of
Israel’s center-left Democrats party, questioned how Netanyahu could declare a
“historic victory” last June—claiming Iran’s nuclear threat and missile
capabilities had been neutralized—only to return months later seeking US
approval to strike Iran again.
Iran will not be the only issue on the agenda. Israeli
officials indicate Netanyahu will also push Trump to harden his stance on Gaza,
demanding Hamas’s disarmament before any further Israeli troop withdrawals
under the second phase of Trump’s peace plan. This comes amid mounting US
frustration over Israel’s repeated violations of the October ceasefire.
While Trump has sought to cultivate a peacemaker image,
Israel’s actions on the ground have complicated that narrative. Near-daily
Israeli strikes have reportedly killed over 400 Palestinians, while a sustained
blockade has left hundreds of thousands displaced, exposed to winter
conditions, and deprived of adequate food, fuel, and medicine.
Trump’s
advisers, according to Axios, increasingly fear Netanyahu is deliberately
undermining the peace process to keep the conflict alive. Beyond Gaza,
Netanyahu is also expected to seek continued US backing for Israel’s
territorial expansion in Syria and renewed latitude to escalate against
Hezbollah in Lebanon—both areas where Israeli actions have already strained US
policy objectives.
As Toossi argues, Netanyahu’s visit reflects not a strategy
to resolve crises but to defer accountability. The meeting’s outcome will test
whether Washington continues to underwrite open-ended escalation—or begins to
draw clearer limits around Israel’s regional ambitions.

No comments:
Post a Comment