Showing posts with label MI6. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MI6. Show all posts

Thursday, 3 July 2025

MI6 appoints a female chief

Following the announcement that MI6 has just appointed Blaise Metreweli as its first-ever female chief, Charlotte Philby, granddaughter of one of Britain’s most notorious double agents and author of ‘The Secret Life of Women Spies’, explains why women make brilliant spies and should be recognized for their service

It has been 15 years since I returned to Moscow for The Independent. Back then, I was a twenty something writer, coming to terms with my father’s death and the many questions about his life that remained unanswered. Among them, what was the impact of learning via a newspaper headline, at the age of 19, that his own father, Kim Philby, was a double agent?

As I trudged along Moscow’s grey, snow-covered streets for the first time since I was a child, tracing my grandfather’s footsteps through the city to which he absconded after being unmasked as the “Third Man” in the Cambridge Spy Ring, I found ever more questions opening up in my mind. Among them, where were all the women?

In the many books, plays and films I had encountered over the years about my grandfather’s life and those he worked with as a Soviet mole, all the stories seemed to be about the men.

There were a few female faces, granted, but these were generally the secretaries or the wives – like Kim’s fourth wife, Rufina (or Rufa, as we knew her), who spoke tearfully about her late husband as we sat side by side on the same sofa that was there when my parents and I visited in the 1980s, in the apartment Kim was given after arriving in the Soviet Union on a tanker from Beirut.

Listening to Rufa – who some say was given to Kim as a reward and a distraction once he arrived behind the Iron Curtain, others that she was placed there by the KGB to keep an eye on him – it was impossible not to wonder about her true part in his story. It was equally impossible to expect I’d ever find out.

Women spies have played some of the most important and varied roles in espionage throughout the ages, as I discovered in researching my new narrative non-fiction book for readers young and old.

The Secret Lives of Women Spies is a collection of stories bringing to life the riveting private world of female spies from the 19th century to the present day. From armed scout for the Union army Harriet Tubman, through to Zandra Flemister, the first black woman to serve in the Secret Service, or the likes of Special Operations Executive agent Noor Inayat Khan, Russian “illegal” Anna Chapman and eccentric US performer turned star of the French Resistance Josephine Baker, the 20 or so women (and girls) featured here operated in all parts of the spy world, risking everything for what they believed in – their actions making make them heroes to some and traitors to others.

As well as telling their astonishing personal stories, the book explores their historical contexts in an attempt to understand their choices. Some, like Indian National Intelligence officer Saraswathi Rajamani, who at the age of 10 told Mahatma Gandhi, “When I grow up, I’m going to shoot an Englishman”, are straightforward. Others, like that of Mata Hari, whose legend as a German agent using her powers of seduction has been undermined as a new vision emerges of a disempowered woman doing everything she could to be reunited with the daughter taken from her by an abusive husband, are less so.

In recent years, there has been a drive towards more transparency and diversity in the British intelligence game. Under the directorship of Dame Stella Rimington – appointed in 1992, the first of two female MI5 chiefs, followed in 2002 by Eliza Manningham-Buller – the domestic security service was ordered to release files to the National Archive after a certain period.

It was thanks to the release of a bundle of papers under this protocol in 2015 that it became clear an Austrian woman named Edith Tudor-Hart, also a brilliant photographer and devoted single mother to a mentally ill son, had been the person responsible for my grandfather’s recruitment by the Soviets in the 1930s. Tudor-Hart was so important that Cambridge spy (and relative of the late Queen Elizabeth II) Anthony Blunt referred to her under interrogation as “The grandmother of us all”.

Interestingly, it was another woman – MI5’s first female officer, Jane Sissmore – who first tried to out Kim as a Soviet mole, though following a row with the acting director general, she was fired for insubordination before she could amass the necessary intelligence to prove her claim.

Women were not regularly recruited as intelligence officers in MI5 or MI6 until the late 1970s. In a recent interview with Harper’s Bazaar, Dame Stella said, “When I first joined MI5 in 1969, the women did the support work and the men did the ‘finding things out’.” She and a group of fellow disgruntled women employees got together and wrote a letter demanding better assignments. Her first test was to go into a pub and find out as much as she could about a person without attracting attention. “I practically got thrown out under suspicion of soliciting!” she added.

Indeed, when Vernon Kell co-founded MI6’s precursor in 1909, he described his ideal recruits as men “who could make notes on their shirt cuff while riding on horseback”.

Until now, a woman had never been at the helm of the UK’s foreign intelligence service, MI6. But that has all changed. As Richard Moore stands down this year as chief of the UK Secret Intelligence Service, the government has now named Metreweli, a career intelligence officer, as his replacement.

Metreweli, 47, who is currently MI6’s head of technology, known as “Q”, joined the Secret Intelligence Service in 1999. She has spent most of her career in operational roles in the Middle East and Europe.

Three of the top four jobs in the agency are already occupied by women, who gave an extensive group interview to the FT in 2022. In it, the director of operations, who grew up in the northwest of England and attended a grammar school, is quoted as saying being a woman can “be a secret sauce … When you’re playing into a culture which is particularly male-dominated, women tend to be underestimated and therefore perceived as less threatening.”

 

Sunday, 18 August 2024

Iranian Court commence trail of US Administration

According to the Tehran Times, an Iranian court has commenced the trial of the US administration and its officials for their role in the 1953 coup against the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. 

The first session was held on Sunday, marking the 71st anniversary of the coup, at the 55th branch of the court dealing with international affairs in Tehran’s Imam Khomeini Judicial Complex. 

This lawsuit, brought by some 402,000 Iranians, targets six American individuals and legal entities for their involvement in the ousting of Mosaddegh, which paved the way for the pro-Western monarchy of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi until the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Lawyer Shami Aghdam, representing the plaintiffs, stated that "documents show the US spy agency CIA, with the help of its British counterpart MI6, planned the coup by using internal and external agents against the legitimate government of Iran on August 19, 1953." 

Aghdam further explained that Washington and London designed the military coup through violating international principles and rules, and interfering in the internal affairs of Iran, intending to maintain their influence and power in the government, securing their interests and looting the country’s property.

He added that the coup was carried out by military and political figures affiliated with the US and British governments, as well as "thugs."

Aghdam concluded by stating that In fact, the coup marked the beginning of Washington’s complete domination over Iran to make it more dependent than before and prevent its independence and progress. The domination lasted for more than 25 years and inflicted costs, as well as material and spiritual damage, on the country and the nation.

The 1953 coup in Iran is known as Operation Ajax by the United States and its lesser-involved ally, Britain. The putsch happened after the Brits took umbrage at Mosaddegh’s decision to nationalize the Iranian oil industry, previously controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC). This move angered Britain, which relied heavily on Iranian oil.

After failing to force the Iranian Prime Minister to walk back on his decision through an economic siege, London decided to seek direct help from the US, who Mosaddegh believed could be a relying partner for Iran in the absence of Britain. 

The CIA, under the direction of Kermit Roosevelt Jr., began planning the coup in early 1953. The operation aimed to create unrest and discredit Mossadegh while rallying support for the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The CIA’s main tool to incite public discontent against Mossadegh was propaganda. Americans portrayed the leader as a communist threat, while also funding opposition groups and organizing violent demonstrations.

On August 19, 1953, the coup was executed. Initially, it faced setbacks, but after some strategic adjustments and further riots, military forces loyal to the Shah took control of Tehran. Mossadegh was arrested, and the Shah was reinstated with increased power.

As stated by many historians as well as top Iranian figures and politicians, the coup toppling Mosaddegh in 1953 opened the floodgates to decades of the US meddling in Iran’s internal affairs. The upheaval, though bitter in nature, also became the first lesson that Iranians learnt, the US cannot be trusted when it comes to respecting the sovereignty, integrity, and independence of other countries. 

“There are some people who say that we should somehow compromise with the US because this way, their enmities might decrease. No, [This is not right]. They have not even shown mercy to those who trusted, pinned their hopes on, and referred to the US for assistance,” Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei explained during a gathering in 2017.  “Who for example?

Dr. Mosaddegh. In order to fight and stand up against the English – this is what he wished to do – he turned to the Americans. He met with and negotiated with them and asked for their help. He trusted them. [But] The coup d'état of the 28th of Mordad (1953 coup) was not launched by the English, rather it was launched by the US against Mosaddegh.”