The eleven countries combined represent around 45% of the
planet’s population, over 40% of world oil production and roughly a third of
global GDP. The BRICS average economic growth rate is likely to be notably
above the global average. That said, the G7’s GDP is still substantially larger
at market prices, and should remain so over the medium term.
The group’s key economic institution, the New Development
Bank (NDB), is still tiny in comparison to other multilateral lenders. The Bank
has financed projects worth around US$33 billion since 2015; in contrast, the
World Bank alone committed around US$50 billion each year over the same period.
Other overarching economic structures are lacking, and a
BRICS trade deal seems difficult to fathom given members’ vastly different
stages of development and policy priorities.
Internal geopolitical disputes could further complicate
economic rapprochement between members: Egypt and Ethiopia are at loggerheads
over a dam on the Nile River, relations between Iran and its Gulf neighbors are
still strained, and there are tensions between India and China over their
shared Himalayan border and Indian restrictions on Chinese imports and
technology.
The expansion of the BRICS could encourage greater political
overtures and financial generosity from the G7 towards emerging markets going
forward; the G20 summit later this year will be key to watch, with the UN
calling on US$500 billion of annual financing from wealthy nations.
More countries are likely to join the BRICS in the coming
years, as current members—particularly China and Russia—look to bolster an
alternative to the G7-led world order.
BRICS members will increasingly conduct intra-member trade
in local currencies to reduce dependence on the dollar, with the yuan and rupee
set to be major beneficiaries.
That said, the US dollar will remain the global reserve currency
for the foreseeable future - incumbency, dollar liquidity, the strength of the
US economy, and the reliability of the US government as a debt issuer are key
advantages. As for the BRICS grouping as a whole, it is likely to remain more
of a political than an economic force.
On the BRICS’ prospects, EIU analysts said, “The BRICS
group will not become a solid construction, regardless of how many bricks are
added to the wall, and it will continue to face internal tensions and
divisions. However, the expansion will bolster its geopolitical significance
and its combined economic power, and the organization will continue to evolve.
The relatively trouble-free and productive BRICS summit will enhance South
Africa’s standing without damaging its relations with key Western partners.”
On the future of the dollar, ING analysts said, “Until
international issuers and investors are happy to issue and hold international
debt in non-dollar currencies – and the take-up of CNY Panda bonds has been
very slow indeed – we suspect this will be a decade-long progression to a
multi-polar world, a world in which perhaps the dollar, the euro and the
renminbi become the dominant currencies in the Americas, Europe and Asia
respectively.”
Courtesy: Focus Economics
No comments:
Post a Comment