Calls from multiple players to delay Pakistan's upcoming
general election threaten what is left of the country's fragile democracy,
experts say, though many expect the polls will go ahead in the end.
The clearest push for a postponement so far came last
Friday, when the Senate passed a resolution urging the government to
put off the February 08 vote due to security concerns. Molana Fazal ur Rehman,
Pakistan's leading Islamist politician, also endorsed the resolution.
Fears of violence are not unfounded. On Monday, six
policemen were killed by the Pakistani Taliban in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province
during an anti-polio campaign, just the latest attack on security personnel.
Last Friday, a religious cleric belonging to a Sunni sectarian group was gunned
down in Islamabad, sparking protests.
But while deteriorating security provides a pretext for
pushing back the election, many politicians, civil society activists and
political commentators told Nikkei Asia that further delaying the already late
vote would damage the democratic system.
"A prolonged caretaker setup that is beholden to the
[military] establishment but not accountable to the people of Pakistan has
eroded civilian say in governance," said Amber Rahim Shamsi, a political
commentator based in Karachi.
After former Prime Minister Imran Khan was ousted in April
2022, a coalition government led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)
party took over. Last August, it dissolved for a caretaker government to
oversee elections, which were originally supposed to be held in late 2023.
Cyril Almeida, a politics expert in Islamabad, believes that
Pakistan is now operating outside constitutional parameters. He said a fixation
has developed on simply preventing Khan - a former cricket star turned Islamist
populist now jailed over corruption allegations he denies - from making a
comeback.
"Military and the civilians not aligned with Imran Khan
have a single-point agenda: Keep Imran Khan out of power," he said.
"So whatever it takes to achieve that, the military and its civilian
allies are willing to contemplate."
Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, which complains
of an uneven playing field, is down but not necessarily out. Election
nomination papers for Khan and an overwhelming majority of PTI leaders were
initially rejected. Later, appellate tribunals overturned most of the
decisions, albeit not for Khan.
On Wednesday, the High Court in Peshawar ruled that the PTI
can contest elections under its trademark symbol, a cricket bat. Earlier, the
Election Commission had deprived the PTI of its symbol on a technicality.
Meanwhile, once-exiled former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif
this week had his ban from politics lifted, clearing him to run. Sharif
and his PML-N party are now widely considered the preference of the military
establishment.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan has expressed
concern about the electoral process. "At this point, there is little
evidence to show that the upcoming elections will be free, fair, or
credible," it said in a January 01 statement on X, formerly Twitter.
Shahid Maitla, another political analyst in Islamabad,
believes the establishment and caretaker government have failed to check the
popularity of Khan, who still has vast appeal among the masses. "The
curtailment of Khan's party is being achieved through the management of courts,
police and media," he said.
He said that some in the "business community,
caretakers and unpopular political players like JUI-F are the ones having
vested interests are exerting pressure on the establishment to postpone [the]
polls," referring to Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazal, the largest Islamist
party, led by Rehman.
Maitla even suggested that some members of the caretaker
government are lobbying prominent journalists to influence the establishment
and judiciary to delay the elections so that they can continue to rule.
Yet, the growing unpopularity of the interim administration
is making that case more difficult, experts say.
In recent days, caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar ul-Haq Kakar
and Information Minister Murtaza Solangi have faced severe criticism for
comments they made at different forums. Kakar suggested women from Balochistan
province protesting forced disappearances were "advocates of
terrorists" and asked those who are supporting them to "go and join
them."
Maitla said that the caretaker government has also failed to
effectively communicate Pakistan's position on the repatriation of Afghan
migrants and the Israel-Hamas war. "Kakar proved a poor
choice" for prime minister, he argued, saying Kakar is keen to interact
with the media but "earned embarrassment."
"The establishment is not happy with the caretakers at
all," Maitla said. "If elections had not been nearing, many of them
would have been replaced."
Almeida in Islamabad said the interim government has
overstepped.
"All caretaker governments lack political legitimacy,
but this particular group has tried to leverage the support it has of the
military into space for weighing in on policy matters and national
controversies," he said.
That leaves elections as the best bet to form a more
legitimate government, despite the efforts to delay them.
A well-placed source within the security establishment
denied rumors that Kakar could be replaced. "'[Kakar] will complete his
tenure and elections will be held on time," the source told Nikkei on
condition of anonymity.
"With Nawaz Sharif back in the country and now cleared
to take part in elections, it is unlikely elections will be postponed at this
late stage," Almeida argued.
Maitla agreed. The "election is a compulsion rather
than a choice for the country and more so for the establishment, as it is
losing its capital fast from the domestic to the international front."
Courtesy: Nikkei Asia