While the role and actions/inactions of major powers Russia,
United States, Europe and NATO as a whole are to be seen and analyzed by many,
in their respective ways, it would be interesting to make an assessment of
implications that it will have on south Asia.
Two major powers in the region, China and India, have found
themselves in an unenviable situation. Both have very close politico-strategic
relations with Russia but neither wants to take an open stance against Ukraine
either, on account of their proximity with US-led Europe.
It is evident that both have failed to openly support the
Russian invasion of Ukraine. They have asked for peace and abstained from three
crucial UN meetings on the issue, leaving Russia to resorting the UNSC Veto and
fend for itself.
China has significant economic stakes in Ukraine. It is the
largest trading partner. Ukraine is one of the major stakeholders of Xi
Jinping’s ambitious political masterpiece Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
project. Both Russia and Ukraine are military suppliers to China as well.
In spite of Chinese political relations with Russia with no
upper limit, its reactions in the ongoing conflict indicate that it was caught
off-guard.
It could not anticipate Putin’s determination and failed to
issue relevant advisory to its citizens in time. While Singapore and Taiwan
issued guidelines to their limited number of citizens in Ukraine as early mid-February,
the Chinese embassy was found clueless about the impending conflict.
Further, China has more of ideological and strategic
affinities with Russia rather economic. The bilateral trade between the two at
US$ 147 billion is about 2% of Chinese global trade. Its trade and economic
stakes with Europe is much more important. Irrespective of the frequent
diplomatic and political skirmishes with the United States, China knows very
well that it cannot afford to get into a full-throttle political, economic or
diplomatic battle with the US and its European allies.
India has almost 20,000 citizens in Ukraine, mostly students
studying medicine there. It has major political, strategic, diplomatic and
economic relations with Russia and cannot afford to antagonize it.
A major chunk Indian military supplies, including hardware
and spares, along with S-400 air defense system too, come from Russia. Though
in recent years, its dependence on Russia has reduced considerably, mainly due
to import diversification to countries like the US, Israel, France and also due
to indigenous ramping up of production and R&D capabilities in defense.
Russia has on all occasions in the last five decades stood
by India, politically and diplomatically, including using the crucial veto in the
UNSC once on the Kashmir issue.
Similarly, Ukraine has good working relations with India but
has voted openly against India on its nuclear tests in 1998, supported the UNSC
sanctions and provided a fair amount of military hardware to Pakistan, to be
used against India. But of late, relations between the two are on an upswing
and India would not like to jeopardize its relations with either.
A comparative cost-benefit analysis of national interests
though certainly outweighs any explicit diplomatic hysteria on the lines,
demonstrated by the west against Russia currently.
India is currently indulged in a delicate balancing act. It
has expressed its concerns against invasion to Russia at the highest levels
privately while appreciating their security concerns. It has also conveyed to
the US and major European countries of its need to perceived neutrality.
At the same time, it is working in tandem with both Russian
and Ukrainian governments, to ensure safety and evacuation of its citizens, at the
earliest.
As for the direct and short-term implications, trade and
military supplies for both China and India, are certain to be affected. Both
are preparing for a significant disruption in their exports to the two warring
nations.
For India, the timely supply of remaining S-400 systems are
of critical significance given the uncertain state of its current
politico-military relationship with China. The middle kingdom on the other
hand, must be watching the outcome of this conflict keenly since it could
provide it an opportunity to re-orient its possible invasion of Taiwan strategy
in due course of time.
A good number Pakistanis stuck in Ukraine are students.
Initially confounded and even putting up a statement of financial limitations,
its government now is trying to evacuate its citizens.
India claims that many Pakistani and Turkish citizens have
been evacuated from the war zone, by identifying themselves as Indian and
hoisting Indian flags on their vehicles since India has strongly demanded the
two warring sides, to ensure safety of its citizens who neither side wishes to
antagonize.
Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan visited Russia the day,
Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine. For Pakistan this became a very awkward
moment since the west became furious with his meeting with the perceived aggressor,
Putin at that very moment.
It is also believed that National Bank of Pakistan became
the first casualty with the US imposing a penalty of US$ 55 million on it while
politically, the country remains at the receiving end of western fury.
Bangladesh with about 3,000 citizens stuck in Ukraine, too
has good working relations with both countries. With Ukraine, its economic
relations are growing rapidly and it is also helping Bangladesh in developing
infrastructure, steel and ports. Similarly, Russia is politically too important
to be disowned and criticized by it.
Nepal too has few citizens left in the war zone that have
reportedly been evacuated by the Indian authorities and brought back home.
Maldives, the tiny island nation in the Indian Ocean has
started feeling the impact of war since a considerable number of its foreign
tourists involve both Russian and Ukrainians.
Though the south Asian region remains a bit far off from the
battle raging on yet it has certainly affected countries there.
The Russo-Ukraine war has also resulted in delicate
diplomatic balancing by countries around the world and China and India,
primarily are on the radar.
The United Nations has not been successful in negotiating
ceasefire, which raises another big question mark on the utility of the world
body. The efficacy of the US-led NATO too raises doubts, both among its members
and non-members. However, to prevent widespread destruction and disorder, the
early the war is stopped the better that would be for the world and the
humanity.
