The only difference was that a member National Assembly, Shehbaz Sharif, became prime minister for the remaining term, whereas in Bangladesh chief of army became head of the government for the interim period till new elections are held.
Muda insisted that in change of regime in Bangladesh and
Pakistan, United States played a key role, and the architect of change in
regimes in both the countries was Donald Lu, US assistant secretary of state.
In the recent past I have been taking about three types of
countries which United States hates.
During her three regimes Hasina made Bangladesh from strong to stronger,
evident from GDP growth rate and foreign exchange reserves held by the country.
However, Bangladesh was lured to approach IMF for a bailout
package.
Muda insisted that United States was not happy with Hasina
due to her tilt towards China, which has been mediating between countries
having long history of animosity. United States believed the restoration of
diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran would weaken its influence in
the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
It is on record that Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates
(UAE) refused to join a naval task forces led by United States and some of the
European countries to take action against Houthis of Yemen.
In the saga, India played the role of most trusted friend of
Hasina, it took her out of Bangladesh and provided a safe haven.
Muda believes that the whole controversy started when
students demanded to end the quota system for the children of those who had
fought against Pakistan Army.
Therefore, India has to arrange for a safe exit of Hasina.
She and her father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman played a key role in turning East
Pakistan into Bangladesh.
No comments:
Post a Comment