De-dollarization of the global financial system is the
long-term goal of the bloc amid Western economic sanctions on several members.
For example, Saudi Arabia and the UAE might face rising pressures to sell oil
to China and India in a currency acceptable and dependable. Trade in general is
set to be increasingly carried out in the bloc’s currencies. Nonetheless, a
common BRICS currency is not an easy task given the Gulf countries’ heavy
links with the West and the Petrodollar, large economic disparities among
members, and the strength of the Western financial system.
BRICS economies will remain heterogeneous, with marked
differences in their stage and pace of development, and in economic size and
structure. For example India, Egypt and Ethiopia will grow at the fastest
rates, boosted by great catch-up potential. China will benefit from its
high-tech manufacturing sector. Non-oil diversification strategies will
buttress activity in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. In contrast, Brazil, Iran,
Russia and South Africa are set to grow at underwhelming clips due to
lackluster progress on structural reforms.
The
western analysts believe, “Expansion will bolster the BRICS geopolitical
significance—provided the group can reconcile its internal tensions—and its
combined economic muscle, but the direct economic impact will be small. The
BRICS group is unlikely to become a solid geopolitical and economic
construction, regardless of how many bricks are added to the wall.”
The biggest agreement
is, “Despite some pressure, the Petrodollar will remain the preferential
currency for trade. A greater role of BRICS and other emerging markets in
global trade may create more natural demand for alternatives to Petrodollars,
but this has not happened so far. The higher share of CNY in trade invoicing
doesn’t seem to be dethroning Petrodollar, but rather pushing out second tier
developed market FX, such as GBP. One direction in which Petrodollar could be
challenged given the geopolitical confrontation is the higher focus of BRICS
trade on other emerging market economies.”
No comments:
Post a Comment