The western media, under the clutches of Zionists, is never
tired of promoting United States as the biggest democracy and peacekeeper on
this planet. The bitter reality is opposite and only displayed in social media,
which is often not liked by those at the top of helm of affairs even in the
United States. The most recent evidences are ongoing turmoil being created in Venezuela
and the failed efforts to topple the incumbent government in Syria of the
United States.
The hallmark of the
US administration is telling lies and spreading disinformation with such a frequency
that often a person with average wit is misled and start believing in lies. It
may be said that the US spy agencies tell lies the way authoritarians do
to demonstrate and expand their power. Three of the most glaring examples of
blatant lies of spy agencies are presence of OBL in Afghanistan, manufacturing
of WMD by Iraq and nuclear program of Iran. All this could be best understood
if one just has a cursory look at eight years of corrosive lies of the US
administration about Syrian war.
Let us begin with a story published in the Wall Street
Journal about Syria telling that the United States may leave 1,000 troops
in that country after all. If one can recall, the US president had announced a
complete withdrawal of troops from Syria months ago. Then, weeks later the
White House announced that a small force of 200 would stay behind. Now,
the Journal was reporting that it would actually be 1,000. A few
hours later the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said the original
plan remained unchanged.
Reviewing three assertions routinely made about Syria by
pundits, politicians, and policymakers show complete hypocrisy: 1) Syria shows
the perils of U.S. non-intervention; 2) We’re only in Syria to fight ISIS and
3) U.S. withdrawal from Syria would mean handing a victory to Vladimir Putin. All
of the above statements have become conventional wisdom. The same people
sometimes repeat more than one of them, but they are entirely irreconcilable
with one another.
If withdrawing from Syria means handing a victory to
Vladimir Putin, then the US is doing something other than fighting ISIS there,
something that certainly can’t be described as non-intervention.
CIA began the US mission in the Syrian Civil War years
before ISIS came into being, and a full year before President Barak Obama began
talking up his red lines and proposing a congressional vote to authorize
intervention in Syria.
The world was told that the US was arming moderate rebels,
but these moderate rebels fought side by side Al Nusra fighters who were often
known to be using weapons brought in by the CIA or the Department of Defense to
fight this war in which the US was not intervening. The US also funded a group
called Nour al-Din al-Zenki, until its members showed up on YouTube beheading a
child, at which point the moderate label no longer quite fit.
Apparently the Congress refused to authorize US military
intervention in Syria, which was already ongoing. Did the intervention stopped?
No, it continued under the 2001 AUMF that authorized the president to make war
on al-Qaeda. The US is now using the legal authority to hunt and destroy
al-Qaeda to fund and arm al-Qaeda’s allies on the ground in Syria.
