Spearheaded by Congressman Bill Huizenga and co-led by
Democrat Sydney Kamlager-Dove, the bipartisan measure draws rare unity across
America’s political divide. By invoking the Global Magnitsky Act, it targets
Pakistani officials — past or present — complicit in human rights abuses,
corruption, or suppression of free elections. The message is unambiguous: no
official, no matter how powerful, is beyond accountability.
This
bill does more than threaten sanctions. It reaffirms America’s commitment to
Pakistan’s people, not its ruling elites. It echoes House Resolution 901, which
passed with overwhelming support earlier this year, and builds pressure on
Islamabad to restore democratic norms, rule of law, and freedom of expression.
The statements from lawmakers underscore its intent. Huizenga
declared that the US will not sit idle as abuses mount. Kamlager-Dove stressed
that defending democracy must remain central to US policy. Democrat Julie
Johnson warned that those who undermine free elections will face consequences
on the global stage.
Equally significant is the role of the Pakistani diaspora.
Advocacy groups such as the Pakistan-American Public Affairs Committee and
First Pakistan Global pushed tirelessly for this legislation.
Their efforts transformed grassroots frustration into congressional
action. As Dr Malik Usman noted, the bill embodies Haqeeqi Azadi — real freedom
— standing shoulder-to-shoulder with 250 million Pakistanis in demanding
justice and the release of political prisoners, including former Prime Minister
Imran Khan.
The legislation’s bipartisan nature and alignment with
earlier resolutions suggest strong momentum in Congress. More importantly, it
places Pakistan’s ruling establishment under unprecedented international
scrutiny.
For decades, authoritarian practices in Pakistan thrived
under the shield of strategic alliances. That era may be ending.
With this bill, the US draws a clear line ‑ friendship with
Pakistan does not mean indulgence of its oppressors. It means solidarity with
its people, their rights, and their democratic aspirations.
No comments:
Post a Comment