Pakistan: Fear of
terrorism during polls
Many
quarters are expressing fear of terrorist attacks during forthcoming general
elections. Terrorist has already issued a threat to ex-president Pervez
Musharraf who has come back to Pakistan. Earlier some of the Baloch leaders had
warned of bloodshed and even killing of clan leaders. The ex-interior minister
has been issuing such warnings but often failed in rounding up the
perpetrators.
It has been
highlighted repeatedly that Pakistan does face threat from external forces but
the real cause of concern is 'embedded enemies' that often occupy key
positions.
There are
politicians who act as viceroy of regional and global super powers. No one can
deny presence and support to the perpetrators by the personnel of law enforcing
agencies. And above all the perpetrators develop their hide outs in areas
having ethnic concentration and use people as human shields.
The proof of
involvement of external forces can be gauged from the delay in installation of
caretaker set up. This reminds one of the posts placed on Facebook. "There
is so much concern about the names who will be there for 90 days, who would
also not be allowed to make some of the strategic decisions as those are
prerogative of elected assemblies but there has been least concern about those
who will participate in the general elections".
Some of the
critics may say, "We don't read every statement posted on Facebook"
but these are people who also can't read 'writing on the wall'. When the
attention of these elements is drawn towards writing on the wall, most of them
ask, where is the wall?
In fact
these self proclaimed experts suffer from the worst myopia and can't see beyond
their nose. As against this, many of the external elements that have interest
in the region are adamant at exploiting Pakistan's positions.
One can say
only with great regret that Pakistan's strategic location has become its biggest
enemy. All those who wish to establish their hegemony in the region want the
rulers to remain subservient.
Among all
the countries United States has the largest interest and one of its proofs is
the statement of US Ambassador to Pakistan Richard Olson. Ambassador has said
lately that his country has no desired outcome from the May 11 elections in
Pakistan but stressed on the need for strengthening democracy in the friendly
nation.
In a
discussion on US-Pakistan relations at a Washington think-tank, Olson observed
that there has been a strategic shift in Pakistan's policies towards India and
Afghanistan.
The
ambassador said both the United States and Pakistan recognized that in the past
they had a relationship that tended to go in cycles, "from periods of
excessive enthusiasm to periods of neglect". But both sides now wanted to
avoid this and take the relationship to a more stable footing and on an even
keel.
However, responding to another question on the
region's energy needs, the US ambassador said, "What we would like to see
is for the energy supply to run through Afghanistan and through Pakistan to the
Indian market."
In the same
breath he reiterated that the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline is sanctionable under
the Iran Act. "We've had a duty to warn our Pakistani friends that the
pipeline that's under consideration is likely to be sanctionable under US law.
Some of the cynics take this as a warning that
if the rules go ahead with the pipeline. Pakistan could not only face economic
sanctions but political turmoil, similar to the one faced by the Morsi
government in Egypt.
Some even go
to the extent that due to poor law and order election may be deferred up to
three years, till Nato withdrawal is complete.
No comments:
Post a Comment