Strangulated Pak India
diplomatic relations
One often has
to believe the conspiracy theories, though hate it the most. One such theory is
that whenever it seems that the two countries are about to achieve a major
breakthrough on the diplomatic front, suddenly tension starts developing on
borders. Personnel of border forces from both the sides are killed and the
entire efforts flop.
This has happened again lately when it looked almost
certain that new visa policy will be introduced by India. There is also
pressure on Pakistan to grant India MFN status but certain elements even don’t
approve this.
Historically,
India has been saying that extremist groups of Pakistan are the stumbling
block, but ignoring the extremist groups present within. If Pakistani’s demand
giving right of self determination to Kashmiris, the immediate response of
Hindu extremists is, “We will not allow another division of Hindustan on the
basis of religion.”
Neither of the sides knows nor even wishes to know how Kashmir
issue could be resolved. A question arises; it is an issue being faced by the
two neighbors or a geopolitical confrontation in which regional and global
powers are involved?
If one looks
at the history it becomes evident that the British Raj left a few thorns to
ensure that animosity between India and Pakistan remains. They knew that these
two countries (now three, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) had the potential to
become one of the strongest economic blocs of the world.
These countries put
together enjoy enormous economic potential, offer a market comprising of
millions of people and above all most dedicated workers. These three countries
are part of SAARC and should have ideally signed free trade agreements, which
also bodes well for smaller countries of the region.
Fallout of
this ongoing animosity is that Pakistan and India have been spending billions
of dollars annually on the procurement of conventional and non-conventional
arms. Both the countries have attained the status of nuclear power and have
been living in a state of war from the day they got independence from the
colonial rule.
Experts are of the view
that had the two countries spent this money on the welfare of their people,
most probably these would have been the richest and most developed countries of
the world. The reason for making subcontinent a colony was that it was called
‘golden sparrow’ even at that time.
Some of the
western experts may not agree with the above assertion but this can be best
understood by looking at the creation of Israel and encroachment of areas of
neighboring Arab countries. Israel has grown only because of the support of
United States and Bangladesh could have not been created without the active
support of India and United States.
The story has not ended and the efforts have
continued to further fragment the country into Greater Pakhtunistan,
independent Balochistan and Sindhudesh as well as Jinnahpur.
Historically,
Pakistan has been providing transit trade facility to landlocked Afghanistan. Pakistan’s
importance was realized when the United States decided to help Afghanistan in
averting USSR attack. Pakistan’s importance has been further highlighted over
the last ten-years due to ongoing war on terror in Afghanistan.
To undermine
Pakistan’s importance India has been fully supported by the United States to
construct Chabahar port in Iran and also rail and road link up to Central Asia
passing through Afghanistan.
Not only
Pakistan but some of the other SAARC member countries feel that Indian high
headedness has not allowed functioning of this forum as planned. The common
complaint is that India wants to take advantage of its enormous size and keep
all other countries, including Pakistan its periphery.
At times it is realized
that India wants to create its hegemony in the region. In this endeavor, India
is fully supported by the United States.
There is a
growing realization that the United States considers Pakistan ‘mercenary’ and
India a business partner. India has been rewarded with nuclear technology for
not joining Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline but Pakistan was not being treated
at par.
A lot of the US companies have outsourced their business to Indian
enterprises but Pakistan remains a victim of ‘travel advise’ issued by
Washington. While Pakistan’s demand of ‘trade not aid’ has not been accepted, disbursements
under coalition support funds have been delayed on one or the other pretext.
A question
arises; is all this humbug there to undermine Pakistan’s importance or to
create Indian hegemony in the region? While it is the easiest for the United
States and India to undermine Pakistan’s importance, it may not be wrong to say
Pakistan’s faulty foreign policy has often annoyed other major super powers,
particularly USSR of the past and Russia of today.
At times even Pakistan’s
time test friend China is unable to understand some of the decisions made in
Islamabad. Foreign policy gurus often say that being a periphery to United
States has caused enormous losses to Pakistan.
One can
recall Army chief had lately said Pakistan faces enormous internal threats but
many failed to understand the threat. However, it became evident lately when
the country was witnessing political volatility, India resorted to unprovoked
firing and its Army chief threatened to unilaterally initiate attack Pakistan
blaming it of cross border terrorism.
Intellectuals
from both the sides have been involved in confidence building measures but
process is derailed on one of the other pretext. The new visa policy has been
invoked on the pretext that Pakistan was involved in killing of Indian border
forces, Pakistan also raises similar allegation against Indian troops.
The recent
Indian aggression had refreshed the memories of fall of Dakha when India
supported the rebel groups and the fight ended at the surrender of more than 90
Pakistani soldiers and officers. Fears are being expressed that United States
and India are supporting Baloch insurgent groups.
Though, India has been
denying its involvement the question remains, who is proving arms and funds to
Baloch insurgents?