Over the last more than two months many countries were told
by World Health Organization (WHO) to opt for lockdown to fight wide spreading coronavirus
pandemic. In the mean time one of the equally fast developing narratives is
that it is an ongoing biological war between United States and China.
If one can recall Saddam Hussein of Iraq was accused for the
production of weapons of mass destruction. A few sites were identified and destroyed,
but soon it became evident that the entire propaganda was very well concocted.
However, some observers went to the extent of saying that these sites produced material
which was used against Iran in a war spread over more than a decade.
Coming back to my topic, it may be suspected that United
States was not happy, rather afraid of growing economic might of China.
Initially to keep a close watch the US companies were allowed to make huge
investment in China and Chinese were allowed to invest in United States. Growing
deficit in balance of trade prompted United States to impose restrictions on
the entry of Chinese good, but all in vain.
One of the conspiracy theories is that United States leaked
a virus in Wuhan, to ultimately reach the industrial hub of Shanghai. The move
backfired as China saved its industrial hub, but virus spread to almost all the
countries on the plant, except a few.
Scanning the content printed one is inclined to arrive at a
conclusion that this is not a pandemic but a biological war. After more than four
decades of engagement, the two superpowers have been unable to bridge the
ideological gulf that separates them. A global pandemic might have served as an
occasion for more cooperation; instead it has only made the divide more obvious.
The two countries now stand on the brink of a new type of cold war.
The level of trust between China and the United States is at
its lowest point since diplomatic ties were established in 1979. The
deterioration in US-China ties began long before the pandemic and even before
the Trump presidency. A fundamental shift in the relationship has taken place. American
interests now diverge more than they converge.
China’s return towards communist orthodoxies since Xi
Jinping became president in 2013 has had a crucial impact. Tthe fundamental
difference in ideology between the US and China can be summed as, “Between 1978
and 2012, the Communist party put aside its communist roots and focused on
developing economic strength. Once China succeeded economically, the CCP went
back to refocus on its original intentions of building socialism. For decades,
this bargain delivered impressive commercial gains; making China the prime
engine for global growth.
Tens of thousands of US companies set up business in China
and bilateral trade last year amounted to US$541 billion. China is often accused of showing less
willingness to accept US global leadership and began carving out its geographical
spheres of influence. One critical breach of trust was termed deployed huge
military infrastructure on the islands by China.
In US-China commercial relationship accusations of violation
of intellectual property rights became a big hurdle. This prompted Washington
to impose tariffs on a range of Chinese goods, triggering a 20-month trade war
that was put on hold in January this year with a truce deal that remains
extremely fragile.
Reportedly, total Chinese investment in the US fell to US$5 billion
last year, from a recent peak of US$45 billion in 2016, when Chinese companies
were much more free to acquire US businesses. On top of that Trump
administration and lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been considering other moves
against China, including more stringent export controls, curbs on investment
flows and limits on integrated supply chains between the two countries — all in
the midst of a deep global recession.
Trump also threatened to terminate the January trade deal
with China, which could lead to a new flare-up in tariffs, because of skepticism
over China’s willingness to honour its pledge to buy billions of dollars of
American goods.
Apparently, both sides claim that good progress is being
made and fully express willingness to meet their obligations under the agreement
in a timely manner, but ongoing blame game becomes the biggest dampener. Some
observers predict continued tension, with nationalist sentiment and recession
supporting hardliners in both countries. It appears extremely difficult to
contain deteriorating relationship. Strategic competition will remain the
dominant factor.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment