From Colonialism to Corporate Imperialism

At the age of 61 and having written over 2.5 words, this morning I sat down to review my work. Just the other day in one of my blogs I termed Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, the new Lawrence of Arabia. I spent a few hours in searching what the world is saying about him, his vision and mission and modus operandi. This search further consolidated my perception. Therefore I sat down to pen what I have witnessed over the years, especially during the last four decades.

I joined Institute of Business Administration (IBA) Karachi in 1973. This is the premier Business School established in Pakistan with the financial assistance and curriculum guidelines provided by one of the leading Business Schools of United States. My first employment was with a corporate having majority stake from United States also. My second job was with a group that was one of the top 25 richest families as described by the then Prime Minister Zufikar Ali Bhutto. Subsequently, I set up my own business but faced virtual bankruptcy due to the worst linguistic riots in Karachi during 1986-92. During this turmoil period I started contributing articles in local media as economic analyst.  Since then I have graduated from economic/financial analyst to commentator on political economy and geopolitics. During this quarter of a century, the key sectors in focus have been textiles and clothing, energy, commercial banks, fertilizer and country’s economy, its relationship with multilateral lenders, global mergers and acquisitions and their impact on local corporate sector. Another key area of interest has been ongoing privatization in the country that began in early nineties.

In my life I have witnessed three wars between Pakistan and India and conversion of eastern part of the country into Bangladesh. In Middle East expansion of Israel through occupation of parts of Arab countries and Arabs realizing power of crude oil. Islamic revolution in Iran and since then the country faced economic sanctions. Iraq’s attack on Iran and a decade long war financed by Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Iraq’s attack on Kuwait, 9/11 incidenent, US attack on Iraq and Afghanistan, toppling of regimes in Iraq and Libya and proliferation of Islamic militant groups. If Taliban were accused for buying arms from drug money ISIL is also alleged for acquiring arms in exchange for stolen oil from Iraqi fields and selling it in the global markets.

As regards the corporate sector, there has been a shift in paradigm, slogan changing to optimizing profit from maximizing profit. Mergers and acquisitions are creating ever stronger conglomerates classified under Fortune-500 and Fortune-50 companies. It is often alleged that these companies own 90 percent of global wealth directly or indirectly. These entities are also alleged for playing a major role in installing and toppling of governments in least developed and even developing countries.

People living in South Asia, particularly areas now comprising, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are familiar with East India Company becoming a monster, end of more than 700 years rule of Mughals, 1957 massacre of Muslims and Indian subcontinent becoming part of British Raj. It may also be kept in mind that Britain was not alone; other countries establishing their colonies included France, Portugal and Holland. The two World Wars were also for attaining supremacy and the alliance of big powers created UNO, to protect their vested interest by retaining the veto power with them. They also created World Bank and IMF to control economic policies of the developing countries and keep them perennially dependent on them.

Developed world after having achieved food security also started working on achieving control on energy products. This point had become obvious in mid sixties after a war in the Middle East that only those countries will enjoy power that have control on fossil oil and gas reserves. Multinational exploration and production companies now have virtual control on these reserves, not the countries where these reserves are located. Crude oil prices are driven by hedge funds and not demand and supply. The worst victims of ‘ongoing energy war’ are Iraq, Iran, Libya and Nigeria. If economic sanctions were imposed on Iran to curb its oil export, Libyan and stolen Iraqi oil is being sold in the global markets by groups enjoying support of Zionists.

Ironically Muslim countries are the worst victim of ‘divide and rule’ legacy of colonial era. They have been divided into sects and sub-sects. Though, there is interfaith harmony to a large extent, Western media, under the control of Zionists, is constantly talking about Shia-Sunni war. The simultaneous emergence of ISIL and Israeli attack on Gaza are part of the grand agenda to render Muslims powerless, through financial assassination. Muslims don’t need leaders propagating killing but reformist talking about interfaith harmony. They must learn to distinguish between friend and foe or get ready for their elimination because only the hypocrite will perpetuate.

                                                                               

Chabahar Port: India losing against China

I am flattered when I see visitors still viewing one of articles published in eurasiareview.com posted at this site in 2013. My point was that India has been over reacting about Chinese assistance extended in the construction of Gwadar port in Baluchistan province of Pakistan. India has been creating the hype that Chinese presence in Gwadar is not only a serious threat for India but would also give China extra leverage in the region. India also accused that China has acquired management control of Gwadar to use it as its naval base. This mantra was aimed at seeking support of United States and Russia, who consider China a major threat to their hegemony in the region.
Indian propaganda has been aimed at creating an impression that Afghanistan was highly unhappy with Pakistan and it is willing to join hands with India to move its shipments through Chabahar port. India also tried to pass on the message to Central Asian countries that the the port, located in warm waters, and the road and rail network being constructed would become a gateway for them to the rest of world. There are regular news being bashed about Iranian, Afghani and Indian cooperation.

However, one of the news quoting Iranian authorities has opened the Pandora box and unleashed the disinformation being spread by India. In a meeting, Hassan Nourian, Iran’s Consul General in India opened the Pandora box and exposed the extent of cooperation being extended by India.

Being a seasoned diplomat, Nourian expressed hope that India would act fast on the Chabahar port, which it had promised to build as far back as 2003. The message in between the lines was loud and clear that Iranians were upset with Indian attitude.

India’s exasperatingly slow progress in building the port — 11 years on, work has not even begun — has been a major source of irritation for the Iranians. After all, they gave the project to India rejecting a Chinese offer. Since then Chinese have finished building Gwadar port in Pakistan that is located 70 kilometers east of Chabahar.

It seems that Iranians have realized, though very late, the reason why India wanted the project — to thwart the Chinese. It has also become evident why the India is dragging its feet — for fear of annoying the US. For Iran, Chabahar port is of great economic importance and its great economic and strategic significance is also known to India. The port has the potential to open a route that leads to Afghanistan, a lucrative market today, and beyond, to the mineral-rich countries such as Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

As Iran is annoyed there emerges an opportunity for China, which is one of the biggest buyers of Iranian oil, seeking a port outside Strait of Hurmaz. India has also realized that the game is slipping out of its hands. If India loses Chabahar to the Chinese, it would greatly undermine much talked about Indian supremacy in the Indian Ocean.

Sri Lanka offered the Humbantota port development project to India, twice. The tsunami-ravaged port was in President Rajapaksa’s constituency and he was keen on re-building it. While India dithered, China jumped in. Humbantota has developed into a fine port. India ceded a key strategic space in its own backyard to China. No one could be blamed except India because UPA partner DMK didn’t let India do any development work in Sri Lanka. Now, Chabahar is going the Humbantota way.

While India drags its feet in Myanmar, China is moving in fast. While India (in fact, NHPC) dumped the two hydro-electric projects terming those “too expensive”, China is going ahead with as many as 33 projects. The port of Sittwe is critically important for India, for it would open up the North East. India did secure the project — it was given to the Essar Group. There have been delays, but the work is on. However, the project is only a part of what India had committed to doing, which was to build the entire multi-modal transport corridor — the Kaladan project. For parts of the project other than the port, even the tenders have not been floated.

Place after place in India’s neighborhood, including Afghanistan are slipping out of its dominance and going under Chinese influence. It is only because of dichotomy of Indian policies, it on one hand tries to extract all the possible benefits by making false promises and on the other hand desert those projects once United States and Russia enhance aid/assistance that helps in achieving the status of regional super power and creating its hegemony in South Asia.

South Asia and MENA Inferno

Are the conflicts real or just to keep arsenal factories running at full capacity?

Over the last more than three years I have written dozens of articles on “Geo Politics in South Asia and MENA”. I have a few premises: 1) the region is reach in agriculture that provides food and raw material for industries, 2) it has huge population which makes it one of the biggest markets, 3) countries located in the region are rich in minerals ‑ from crude oil to precious metals including uranium. That is the reason region remained prime attraction during colonial and cold war eras and it remains the biggest attraction for Fortune-500 Companies, who install and topple governments in the countries located in the region. Super powers also create conflicts, support rebel groups by providing funds and arms to continue ‘proxy wars’, mainly to keep their arsenal factories running at full capacities.

Since I live in Pakistan, my concerns can be priorities as follows: 1) the immediate concern is my country and its immediate neighbors, 2) proxy wars being fought in the regions, 3) hatred being created among groups in the name of cast, creed and religion and 4) wars and atrocities being impose to plunge these countries deeper into poverty and hunger.

Let me begin with Pakistan, while granting independent status to India and Pakistan British Raj let a thorn – Kashmir. Based on the conflict hawks were groomed on both sides of borders, one claiming that India can’t be divided once again on the basis of religion and other insisting that relationship between the two countries can’t be normalized till resolution of Kashmir issue.

Over more than 65 years both the countries have been spending billions of dollars annually to accumulate more and more arms that includes attaining ‘atomic power status’. Had this amount spent on development and welfare of people in both the countries, I am sure by this time the per capita income would have reached US$25,000 as against existing paltry income ranging from US$1,200 to US$2,500.  

For the last four decades Pakistan has been fighting ‘Proxy US War’ in Afghanistan.  The country was dragged in this conflict to contain USSR’s access to warm waters. However, it seems that in the post 9/11 era the US occupation of Afghanistan is to get control on ‘white powder’, which has become the biggest source for purchasing arms and the breeding nursery for mercenaries who indulge in cross border terrorism in Pakistan and Iran. Taliban are the product of United States that fought its Proxy war in Afghanistan and now are fighting against the ruling regimes in many Muslim countries including Pakistan. They have been given different names in different regions but have one common object, spreading anarchy.

India is often projected as: 1) one of the biggest democracies of the world, 2) nonaligned and secular state and 3) regional super power. However, it had extracted benefits during cold war era and even today it is drawing benefits from both United States and Russia in the name of countering expansionism of China. The sitting Prime Minister of India has been alleged for genocide of Muslims and supporting extremist Hindus. India has been very smartly extracting benefits from United States, the most prominent being ‘agreement for nuclear technology for civilian use’ in exchange for deserting Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project.

The United States has been supporting India in creating its hegemony in South Asia and also encouraged it to deal with Somali pirates’ issue. While Pakistan was forced to stop purchase of oil from Iran and construct Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, India was not only allowed to buy huge quantity of oil but also to help financially/technically in the construction of Chabahar port in Sistan-Baluchistan province of Iran. The two measures were aimed at keeping Pakistan dependent on Middle Eastern oil and undermine importance of Gwadar port. However, it remains a fact Pakistan offers the shortest and the most cost effective route to Central Asia passing through Afghanistan.

Many Pakistanis suspect that militancy and anti-Pakistan sentiments in its Baluchistan province are being created to create justification for the creation of Grater Baluchistan that will comprise one slice each from Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. This proposed country will have over 1,200 kilometer long coastal line. This has huge oil and gas reserves, which will come directly/indirectly under the control of United States and the country will also bring transit trade from Pakistan to virtually zero.

Iran faces sanction for more than 35 years, which were eased recently for the reason best known to the developed countries. However, some quarters say it is an attempt to ‘terrify’ Saudi Arabia, which was brainwashed in the past and made to believe that ‘Iran is a bigger threat to Muslims as compared to Israel’. It is on record that Saudi Arabia and Kuwait encouraged Iraq under Saddam Hussain to attack Iran and provided funds to continue this war for nearly a decade. The breach between Saudi Arabia and United States widened when the sole surviving super power refused to attack Syria.

The recent insurgency in Iraq is aimed at splitting it into three feeble countries. After facing most humiliating defeat in Lebanon and Syria, Israel under the patronage of United States is supporting various groups, the most prominent being ISIL. Some analysts say yet another ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ is in making. His forces are stealing Iraqi oil, selling it to other countries and buying arms from the receipts.

Interestingly, the United States is warring countries not to buy oil from ISIL, but some countries are certainly buying it, may be off the record and selling it as ‘their won oil’ in the international markets.  One point is very clear that stolen oil is being used for purchasing arms for encountering ruling regimes in countries located in the region, particularly Iraq and Syria.

Interestingly ISIL claims to be fighting for the rights of Muslims but putting no resistance against Israeli atrocities in Gaza. This gives a reason to believe that ISIL is there to fragment Muslims and make them weaker but not to pose any resistance against plans of CIA and Israeli intelligence agency.

Bestway attains largest cement manufacturing capacity in Pakistan

Bestway Cement having substantial foreign investment has acquired stake held by another foreign investor in Lafarge cement Pakistan. This shows commitment of Bestway Group towards Pakistan. After Bestway attains the largest cement manufacturing capacity in Pakistan, what would be the response of other industry leaders i.e. Lucky and D.G. Khan Cement? Can this acquisition initiate price war? How the other players plan their business plan in post FY18 era when industry achieves maximum capacity utilization? For details visit shkazmipk.com

Pakistan: Sukuk offeres enormous potential

In countries like Pakistan the governments facing shortage of revenue, indulge in borrowing to meet their developmental expenditures. While the conventional banks have been the key beneficiaries of such borrowing, Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) face serious liquidity management problems as these can’t invest in Riba-based instruments like Treasury Bills and Pakistan Investment Bonds. Issue of Sovereign Ijara Sukuk and corporate Sukuk on one hand offers an opportunity to invest in Riba-free instruments and on the other hand opens a venue for IFIs to manage their liquidity in a more prudent manner. Over the years the Government of Pakistan (GoP) has successfully mobilized funds for the infrastructure project and the latest being mobilization of over Rs49 billion equivalent to US$495 million though another Ijarah Sukuk.

Through this Sukuk the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has mobilized funds against M-3 Motorway for a period of three years. This is the first Sukuk that has been issued during the current fiscal year (2014-15). M-3 is a 52 kilometer long strip of motorway situated in Punjab that connects Faisalabad with M-2 near Pindi Bhattian.

This Sukuk has been issued in accordance with the provisions of the Ijara Sukuk Rules 2008. As per transaction mechanism, profit on the GOP Ijara Sukuk will be based on the rental rate benchmarked against the latest weighted average yield of the 6 month Market Treasury Bills or 6-month PKRV (as per FSCD circular 13 dated September 06, 2008). In addition, the rental rate as mentioned may be adjusted based on the difference between estimated supplementary rental and actual maintenance expenses of the underlying asset.

Further, it was also decided that for this particular issue of Sukuk (M-3), the total auction participation of a single Primary Dealer (PD) would be capped at Rs 25 billion or 20 per cent (whichever is the lower) of Total Demand and Time Liabilities-Islamic (excluding FE-25 deposits) of the respective PD Islamic bank / Islamic window of that particular PD. For this purpose, Total Demand and Time Liabilities-Islamic as of 28th March, 2014 were used. The central bank also reserved the right that in case any PD breached the aforesaid limit, it could cancel all or some of the bids of the bank concerned.

The Islamic Banking Department of SBP shall be responsible for monitoring: 1) proper execution and 2) the legal documentation as per approved Shariah structure, to ensure Shariah compliance and seamless management throughout the tenor of the Sukuk and at the time of maturity of the Sukuk. The SBP has advised all the designated PDs for the Sukuk to ensure meticulous compliance with the instructions issued.

Sukuk is an alternative Islamic finance instrument for conventional bonds. This is a certificate that represents ownership in underlying real asset(s). Islamic law does not permit interest and hence conventional coupon paying bonds are impermissible as per Islamic law. However, Islamic law allows sale and lease of real assets and the resulting income in the form of profit on sale or rental income stream on lease of assets. Holders of Sukuk share the lease or profit income generated from the ownership of real assets that the Sukuk certificate represents.

Sukuk has emerged as an instrument of choice after 2008 financial crisis. Not only Muslim countries, but non-Muslim majority countries are also taking interest in it. UK treasury has issued a Sukuk worth £200 million. It became the first sovereign state outside the Muslim world to issue an Islamic bond.

In Pakistan, capital markets are not as developed and most of the formal sector financing takes place through banks. Due to political instability and policy inconsistency, usually, the long term investments are not very popular among the investors. In the last few years, only a handful of IPOs had been made. The bond market is also very small and dominated by sovereign issues than corporate bonds.

While investors had found comfort with bank investments even though these do not offer inflation beating returns, most savers with adequate risk apatite look to invest in secondary market for equities. Karachi Stock Exchange has been offering immaculate that encourages investors to invest in liquid stocks for parking their surplus money.

There are many reasons why corporate bond market did not develop as per expectations in Pakistan. The national savings scheme instruments issued by the GoP offer very attractive yields and these are almost risk free. Some national saving scheme instruments are also tax-free and hence after-tax yield on such instruments are even higher as compared to the corporate bonds.

In Pakistan, prior to the latest issue, 78 Sukuk had been issued amounting to Rs 637.43 billion. Out of these 32 Sukuk issues of Rs 100.10 billion have been fully redeemed. The GoP had issued Ijarah Sukuk in the past to meet its escalating borrowing requirements. Entities like Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGC) had also issued Sukuk in past. Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works also issued an Ijarah Sukuk in 2007.

Sovereign Ijarah Sukuk issued by the GoP have been structured in such a way that it allows the government to utilize surplus liquidity of IFIs. The Sukuk holders are also able to earn Shariah compliant income. It also facilitates Islamic banks to manage their liquidity as well as meet statutory liquidity requirement stipulated by the central bank of Pakistan.

Within the corporate sector, Sitara Chemical Industries Limited, Wateen Telecom, Engro Chemicals, Dawood Hercules, Century Papers & Boards, Attock Generation, Arzoo Textile, Liberty Power, Amreli Steels, Eden Builders, Quetta Textile, Pakistan American Fertilizers, PEL and Kohat Cement are some of the companies that had issued Sukuk in past. Out of these, only one private sector entity Maple Leaf Cement defaulted on Rs8 billion Sukuk in 2009.

Recently, K-electric (formerly KESC) issued Rs6 billion Sukuk that were to be listed Karachi and Lahore stock exchanges. There was no Pre-IPO placement and the entire amount of Sukuk issue was offered to retail investors and it was fully subscribed in a matter of few hours.

Through issue of more Sukuk, the investment class assets universe will expand and it will also enable those seeking Riba-free return to effectively diversify their portfolios. Treasuries of Islamic banks will also have an expanded set of investment avenues. It will increase liquidity of these Sukuk and generate wider interest among all investors in the economy to consider investing in these investment vehicles.

Moody’s improves Pakistan outlook

Moody's has revised the outlook on Pakistan's foreign currency rating to Stable from Negative, with the move occurring post a "stabilization in the country's external liquidity position." This does not come as completely unexpected. Pakistan's total foreign exchange reserves have risen to a 2-year high of US$14.6 billion and exchange rate parity also improved by 6.7 percent CYTD against US Dollar.

With the outlook change having the potential to act as a self-fulfilling prophecy, analysts expect further improvement in rating. This should facilitate the valuation rerating process where the KSE-100 Index still trades at a forward P/E of 8.0x, at a discount of 18% to its average 7-year P/E multiple of 9.4x.  Pakistan’s leading brokerage house AKD Securities forecast June'15 Index target at 35,000 points.
The rationale to revise the outlook is "primarily based on stabilization in the country's external liquidity position supported by the GoP's strong commitment to reforms under an ongoing program with the IMF."

In the near-term, this vote of confidence from Moody's may encourage State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to lower discount rate, although analysts still maintain that the central bank may choose to follow a cautious approach keeping in view geopolitical risks to international crude oil prices.

After offering a muted 0.18% return, the KSE-100 Index gained 1.32% on Monday after news came that Moody's has raised the outlook for Pakistan's foreign currency rating. This underpins the view that the valuation rerating process has room for further improvement and prospects for medium-term triggers such as a credit ratings upgrade and upgrade to MSCI Emerging Markets have improved. 

China the biggest buyer of Iranian oil

China, Tehran's largest oil client, has since late 2013 been stepping up purchases after a landmark November nuclear deal eased some sanctions on Iran and has been making up the main portion of stronger Asian imports since then.

China's Iranian crude imports rose by more than a third in May to the second highest on record, helping keep overall Asian buying above the level allowed under a deal that eases some Western sanctions, government and tanker-tracking data showed.

Iran's biggest buyers - China, India, Japan and South Korea - together bought 1.26 million barrels per day from the Islamic republic last month, up 8 percent from the same period a year ago, government and tanker-tracking data showed.

For the first five months of 2014, the aggregate imports averaged 1.25 million bpd, up 25.3 percent from a year ago, keeping Tehran's exports above one million bpd cap that it agreed under a deal with the West for six months to ending July 20, 2014.

There are no indications that Washington will loosen up on the cap until a full nuclear deal with Tehran is reached, but there have been some signs of improving ties, including on how to respond to an Islamist militant insurgency in northern Iraq.

There are concerns about unrest in Iraq that may disrupt oil supplies, but some importers consider Iranian supplies more stable than Iraqi crude.

Tough western sanctions since 2012 had slashed Iran's oil exports and crippled its economy by choking the flow of foreign exchange, but some of those measures were relaxed in November last year after a  diplomatic deal in return for Tehran curbing its nuclear activities and shipments have been up from last year.

Asian buying volumes have held consistently above 1.1 million bpd since January - excluding oil going to other destinations such as Turkey and Syria - indicating the six-month export target will be missed.

Iran's total crude loading also seem to have rebounded in May back up to about 1.38 million bpd, according to sources who track tanker loadings.

Iranian crude imports by China expanded 36 percent in May 2014 from a year ago to the second highest on record of 757,900 bpd, pushing up its average imports for January-May higher to nearly 50 percent on a year earlier.

India's imports fell 0.6 percent to 255,200 bpd in May from a year ago, but its intake in the first-five months of the year still was up 37.7 percent at 310,500 bpd.

South Korea's imports fell 43.3 percent from a year ago to 66,500 bpd of Iranian crude for the month. Shipments to Japan - the last of the four to report its oil intake - fell by 23.7 percent to 181,892 bpd last month.