Behind the new wave of border clashes may lie an old script — one written in Washington and played out in Islamabad and Kabul. Has Pakistan once again been cast in the role of America’s proxy?
The recent spike in Pak-Afghan border tensions has once again pushed the region to the edge of confrontation. Reports suggest that armed militants crossing from Afghanistan have attacked Pakistani security posts, prompting Islamabad’s “severe retaliation.” Yet, beneath the visible smoke of gunfire lies a far more intricate and disturbing reality — one that hints at the shadow of global power politics.
Following
the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Washington appeared to have lost
its strategic foothold in the region. The Taliban’s refusal to hand over the Bagam
Air Base — once a vital hub of American military operations — was not merely a
symbolic rejection; it was a strategic rebuff. The superpower lost a vantage
point near China, Iran, and Central Asia.
It is no
coincidence that within months of that refusal, Afghanistan began facing
renewed instability, and Pakistan started encountering an inexplicable surge in
cross-border attacks.
My
hypothesis is simple: when Washington cannot re-enter Afghanistan directly, it
may seek to create circumstances that justify intervention. The most effective
way to do that is to provoke conflict. The pattern fits. Anonymous “operators”
— possibly non-state actors with advanced intelligence capabilities — carry out
attacks inside Pakistan, inviting a retaliatory strike. The resulting
escalation allows the US to portray the region as unstable and
Taliban-controlled Afghanistan as a “global threat.” A familiar pretext for yet
another intervention is thus created.
Ironically,
Pakistan — which has already paid an enormous price in blood and economy during
the first “War on Terror” — now risks being drawn into another one, this time
as an unwilling participant in someone else’s geopolitical chessboard. The
tragedy is that Islamabad still struggles to draw a clear line between its
national interests and Washington’s regional ambitions. History, it seems, is
repeating itself — and not for the better.
What
complicates matters further is the deep mistrust between Islamabad and Kabul.
The Taliban government, already under economic sanctions and political
isolation, accuses Pakistan of toeing the American line. Pakistan, on the other
hand, blames Afghanistan for harboring militants of the Tehrik-i-Taliban
Pakistan (TTP). Yet neither side seems willing to see how external forces might
be manipulating both.
The
strategic question Pakistan must ask is: Whose war are we fighting this time?
If recent cross-border provocations are indeed part of a larger plan to
destabilize the region, Islamabad must avoid taking the bait. A measured,
intelligence-based response — not blind retaliation — is the need of the hour.
Pakistan’s security cannot depend on reaction; it must rest on foresight.
The lesson
from the past two decades is painfully clear. Every time Pakistan has fought on
behalf of someone else, it has lost — in lives, in reputation, and in internal
cohesion. If history is repeating itself, the least we can do is refuse to play
the same role again.
No comments:
Post a Comment